-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 631
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix output for multiline column comments #779
Conversation
col_name = if with_comments?(klass, options) && col.comment | ||
"#{col.name}(#{col.comment})" | ||
"#{col.name}(#{col.comment.gsub(/\n/, "\\n")})" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I wanted to find something more general and elegant than gsub
, but didn't find a good option. I'd be interested if there are other characters that would be concerning (\t
?) that would make sense to check for and escape as well.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe there's a library for sanitizing whitespace? It might be worth looking into.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I looked a bit, but didn't find anything that stuck out. String#dump
seemed promising, but I believe it escaped UTF characters that were expected to work.
I could make this more generic and escape any \
with \\
if that seems safer.
Woah neat, I didn't know column comments were a thing. |
@tmr08c could you rebase and add comments to make the rubocop step part of CI pass? Happy to merge in after. |
This is a bit of a cheat of a refactoring that simply extracts the logic for collecting a column's attributes out of `get_schema_info` and into its own method (`get_attributes`). I found that in PRs like #779 that the Rubocop ABC limit was being exceeded: ``` lib/annotate/annotate_models.rb:235:5: C: Metrics/AbcSize: Assignment Branch Condition size for get_schema_info is too high. [145/145] def get_schema_info(klass, header, options = {}) ... ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ``` Hopefully, this should break this up and reduce the complexity of the method. There are opportunities to go further, but I thought this could be a good place to start. I would be open and interested in discussing further refactoring opportunities if it would make sense (maybe creating some new classes to encapsulate some of this logic).
If a column comment includes the newline character, the newline character would be "printed" into the annotation block resulting in a line break and an uncommented line. For example, for the following table: ``` create_table "users", force: :cascade do |t| t.string "name", comment: "This is a comment.\nWith two lines!" t.datetime "created_at", precision: 6, null: false t.datetime "updated_at", precision: 6, null: false end ``` annotating the model with the `--with-comment` flag will result in: ``` \# == Schema Information \# \# Table name: users \# \# id :bigint not null, primary key \# name(This is a comment. With two lines!) :string \# created_at :datetime not null \# updated_at :datetime not null \# ``` This uncommented line would result in invalid Ruby and cause the file to no longer be valid. This fix replaces the newline character with an escaped version, so the output will look more like: ``` \# == Schema Information \# \# Table name: users \# \# id :bigint not null, primary key \# name(This is a comment.\nWith two lines!):string \# created_at :datetime not null \# updated_at :datetime not null \# ```
74a2075
to
2e6c777
Compare
This is a bit of a cheat of a refactoring that simply extracts the logic for collecting a column's attributes out of `get_schema_info` and into its own method (`get_attributes`). I found that in PRs like ctran#779 that the Rubocop ABC limit was being exceeded: ``` lib/annotate/annotate_models.rb:235:5: C: Metrics/AbcSize: Assignment Branch Condition size for get_schema_info is too high. [145/145] def get_schema_info(klass, header, options = {}) ... ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ``` Hopefully, this should break this up and reduce the complexity of the method. There are opportunities to go further, but I thought this could be a good place to start. I would be open and interested in discussing further refactoring opportunities if it would make sense (maybe creating some new classes to encapsulate some of this logic).
Closes ctran#778 If a column comment includes the newline character, the newline character would be "printed" into the annotation block resulting in a line break and an uncommented line. For example, for the following table: ``` create_table "users", force: :cascade do |t| t.string "name", comment: "This is a comment.\nWith two lines!" t.datetime "created_at", precision: 6, null: false t.datetime "updated_at", precision: 6, null: false end ``` annotating the model with the `--with-comment` flag will result in: ``` \# == Schema Information \# \# Table name: users \# \# id :bigint not null, primary key \# name(This is a comment. With two lines!) :string \# created_at :datetime not null \# updated_at :datetime not null \# ``` This uncommented line would result in invalid Ruby and cause the file to no longer be valid. This fix replaces the newline character with an escaped version, so the output will look more like: ``` \# == Schema Information \# \# Table name: users \# \# id :bigint not null, primary key \# name(This is a comment.\nWith two lines!):string \# created_at :datetime not null \# updated_at :datetime not null \# ```
This is a bit of a cheat of a refactoring that simply extracts the logic for collecting a column's attributes out of `get_schema_info` and into its own method (`get_attributes`). I found that in PRs like ctran#779 that the Rubocop ABC limit was being exceeded: ``` lib/annotate/annotate_models.rb:235:5: C: Metrics/AbcSize: Assignment Branch Condition size for get_schema_info is too high. [145/145] def get_schema_info(klass, header, options = {}) ... ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ``` Hopefully, this should break this up and reduce the complexity of the method. There are opportunities to go further, but I thought this could be a good place to start. I would be open and interested in discussing further refactoring opportunities if it would make sense (maybe creating some new classes to encapsulate some of this logic).
Closes ctran#778 If a column comment includes the newline character, the newline character would be "printed" into the annotation block resulting in a line break and an uncommented line. For example, for the following table: ``` create_table "users", force: :cascade do |t| t.string "name", comment: "This is a comment.\nWith two lines!" t.datetime "created_at", precision: 6, null: false t.datetime "updated_at", precision: 6, null: false end ``` annotating the model with the `--with-comment` flag will result in: ``` \# == Schema Information \# \# Table name: users \# \# id :bigint not null, primary key \# name(This is a comment. With two lines!) :string \# created_at :datetime not null \# updated_at :datetime not null \# ``` This uncommented line would result in invalid Ruby and cause the file to no longer be valid. This fix replaces the newline character with an escaped version, so the output will look more like: ``` \# == Schema Information \# \# Table name: users \# \# id :bigint not null, primary key \# name(This is a comment.\nWith two lines!):string \# created_at :datetime not null \# updated_at :datetime not null \# ```
Closes #778
If a column comment includes the newline character, the newline character
would be "printed" into the annotation block resulting in a line break
and an uncommented line.
For example, for the following table:
annotating the model with the
--with-comment
flag will result in:This uncommented line would result in invalid Ruby and cause the file to
no longer be valid.
This fix replaces the newline character with an escaped version, so the
output will look more like: