Technical notes on euler release #169
Conversation
mastercyb
changed the title
euler release
|
@xhipster @litvintech Beside that you should review word by word such patches, it is also hard to leave comments for huge paragraphs. There is a simple solution can be used to simplify our reviews. .md language allows you to break you a section into separate lines just by putting them on a new line. I usually place a new sentence on a new line. To create a new paragraph just use two new lines. |
| @@ -14,243 +12,353 @@ cyber: | |||
| - noun. a superintelligent network computer for answers | |||
| - verb. to do something intelligent, to be very smart | |||
|
|
|||
| cyber:// | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It is still blocked by #157. Need to reach consensus on that issue.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
How we can reach it? Do you have an alternative proposal? @litvintech What do you think about it?
docs/cyberd.md
Outdated
|
|
||
| A problem here is that computational complexity of conventional ranks grow sublineary with the growth of the network. So we need to find (1) deterministic algorithm that allow to compute a rank for continuously appended network to scale the consensus computer to orders of magnitude that of Google. Perfect algorithm (2) must have linear memory and computation complexity. The most importantly without having (3) good prediction capabilities for existence of relevant links it proves to be useless. One of recent algorithms: SpringRank. | ||
| Forgetting links: Prune min possible rank / 2 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
A problem here is that the computational complexity of conventional ranks grows sublinearly with the growth of the network.
You mean this?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Prune min possible rank / 2 - this one
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Forget about it. Removed.
docs/cyberd.md
Outdated
|
|
||
| ## Selfish predictions | ||
| ``` Need triple check !!! | ||
| 100 CBD in euler got 70 000 000 000 000 CYB |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I reopen issue regarding genesis.
#156.
I our case it is near ~0.9 * 10^16.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We need to reconcile all amounts across information sources
There was a problem hiding this comment.
near
This is a very sensitive topic. We need to define this unambiguously.
Co-Authored-By: xhipster <starodubcev@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-By: xhipster <starodubcev@gmail.com>
docs/cyberd.md
Outdated
|
|
||
| @xhipster, @litvintech | ||
| Notes for [euler](https://github.com/cybercongress/cyberd/releases/tag/v0.1.0) release of [cyberd](https://github.com/cybercongress/cyberd) reference implementation of `cyber://` protocol in Go |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Also, here should be diff not for just tag 0.1.0 (diff between 0.1.0 and 0.0.9) but diff 0.1.0 -> 0.0.0
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Do you have a link to 0.0.0?
Co-Authored-By: xhipster <starodubcev@gmail.com>
|
Also, this PR should be Squashed and Merged, rather than simply merge. |
Basically, we have chicken and egg problem. Without the full load of the network, the relevance will not become very valuable, without valuable relevance we will not have the full load of the network.
The doc becomes ugly and unreadable :-( Do you aware of the alternative format that is both simple and do have markup of new section? So I hope it is not Latex and Html ... |
…we should paste everything, but a lot must be in the paper.
|
@Olga584 Please help and add the pictures. |
It is not ugly as you think. Just example: https://github.com/hleb-albau/hleb-albau.github.io/edit/source/_posts/2019-01-11-your-chain-genesis-based-on-ethereum-network-activity.md . Also, not all editors supports auto line wrapping. If we weight manteinability and pretty looks for raw .md file, I think we should select the first. |
|
@xhipster ready to approve, just fix Artur comments. |
Agree that this is an issue. But let us start to do this after this release. I do not like how the paper looks like without additional processing. |
|
@xhipster I'm ready to approve too. Is it finished? Or you need to do more changes? |
|
@arturalbov @hleb-albau I need a precise amount of accounts and sum of CYB tokens before merging |
Remainings: 1. Define x, y and z of distribution 2. Grammar 3. Screenshots of .cyber Toliks article can be transalted later.
Thanks to Grammarly this piece will not look like a piece of shit.
Github sucks as sucks almost all sites. This bastards locked us in usage of cursed https ...
Abstract and conclusion must be rewritten. Other parts require proofread, error correction and thorough discussion.