Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix "Cannot read property '__error' of null" error #7534

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 1, 2020

Conversation

chrisbreiding
Copy link
Contributor

@chrisbreiding chrisbreiding commented May 29, 2020

User facing changelog

  • Fixed a regression in 4.6.0 where an XHR response without a body would cause the error Cannot read property '__error' of null

Additional Details

PR Tasks

  • Have tests been added/updated?
  • Has the original issue been tagged with a release in ZenHub?
  • N/A Has a PR for user-facing changes been opened in cypress-documentation?
  • N/A Have API changes been updated in the type definitions?
  • N/A Have new configuration options been added to the cypress.schema.json?

@cypress-bot
Copy link
Contributor

cypress-bot bot commented May 29, 2020

Thanks for the contribution! Below are some guidelines Cypress uses when doing PR reviews.

  • Please write [WIP] in the title of your Pull Request if your PR is not ready for review - someone will review your PR as soon as the [WIP] is removed.
  • Please familiarize yourself with the PR Review Checklist and feel free to make updates on your PR based on these guidelines.

PR Review Checklist

If any of the following requirements can't be met, leave a comment in the review selecting 'Request changes', otherwise 'Approve'.

User Experience

  • The feature/bugfix is self-documenting from within the product.
  • The change provides the end user with a way to fix their problem (no dead ends).

Functionality

  • The code works and performs its intended function with the correct logic.
  • Performance has been factored in (for example, the code cleans up after itself to not cause memory leaks).
  • The code guards against edge cases and invalid input and has tests to cover it.

Maintainability

  • The code is readable (too many nested 'if's are a bad sign).
  • Names used for variables, methods, etc, clearly describe their function.
  • The code is easy to understood and there are relevant comments explaining.
  • New algorithms are documented in the code with link(s) to external docs (flowcharts, w3c, chrome, firefox).
  • There are comments containing link(s) to the addressed issue (in tests and code).

Quality

  • The change does not reimplement code.
  • There's not a module from the ecosystem that should be used instead.
  • There is no redundant or duplicate code.
  • There are no irrelevant comments left in the code.
  • Tests are testing the code’s intended functionality in the best way possible.

Internal

  • The original issue has been tagged with a release in ZenHub.

@cypress
Copy link

cypress bot commented May 29, 2020



Test summary

7707 0 112 0


Run details

Project cypress
Status Passed
Commit f0780fd
Started May 29, 2020 2:22 PM
Ended May 29, 2020 2:29 PM
Duration 07:16 💡
OS Linux Debian - 10.1
Browser Multiple

View run in Cypress Dashboard ➡️


This comment has been generated by cypress-bot as a result of this project's GitHub integration settings. You can manage this integration in this project's settings in the Cypress Dashboard

Copy link
Member

@jennifer-shehane jennifer-shehane left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I manually confirmed this fixes the issue. Tests look great. 👍

@colemars
Copy link

colemars commented Jun 3, 2020

Just encountered this - awesome to see it's already been traced and handled.

Thanks @jennifer-shehane and everyone

@chrisbreiding chrisbreiding deleted the issue-7518-body-error branch April 5, 2022 18:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Cannot read property '__error' of null
3 participants