forked from torvalds/linux
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
libceph: make authorizer destruction independent of ceph_auth_client
Starting the kernel client with cephx disabled and then enabling cephx and restarting userspace daemons can result in a crash: [262671.478162] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ffffebe000000000 [262671.531460] IP: [<ffffffff811cd04a>] kfree+0x5a/0x130 [262671.584334] PGD 0 [262671.635847] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP [262672.055841] CPU: 22 PID: 2961272 Comm: kworker/22:2 Not tainted 4.2.0-34-generic #39~14.04.1-Ubuntu [262672.162338] Hardware name: Dell Inc. PowerEdge R720/068CDY, BIOS 2.4.3 07/09/2014 [262672.268937] Workqueue: ceph-msgr con_work [libceph] [262672.322290] task: ffff88081c2d0dc0 ti: ffff880149ae8000 task.ti: ffff880149ae8000 [262672.428330] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff811cd04a>] [<ffffffff811cd04a>] kfree+0x5a/0x130 [262672.535880] RSP: 0018:ffff880149aeba58 EFLAGS: 00010286 [262672.589486] RAX: 000001e000000000 RBX: 0000000000000012 RCX: ffff8807e7461018 [262672.695980] RDX: 000077ff80000000 RSI: ffff88081af2be04 RDI: 0000000000000012 [262672.803668] RBP: ffff880149aeba78 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 [262672.912299] R10: ffffebe000000000 R11: ffff880819a60e78 R12: ffff8800aec8df40 [262673.021769] R13: ffffffffc035f70f R14: ffff8807e5b138e0 R15: ffff880da9785840 [262673.131722] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88081fac0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [262673.245377] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [262673.303281] CR2: ffffebe000000000 CR3: 0000000001c0d000 CR4: 00000000001406e0 [262673.417556] Stack: [262673.472943] ffff880149aeba88 ffff88081af2be04 ffff8800aec8df40 ffff88081af2be04 [262673.583767] ffff880149aeba98 ffffffffc035f70f ffff880149aebac8 ffff8800aec8df00 [262673.694546] ffff880149aebac8 ffffffffc035c89e ffff8807e5b138e0 ffff8805b047f800 [262673.805230] Call Trace: [262673.859116] [<ffffffffc035f70f>] ceph_x_destroy_authorizer+0x1f/0x50 [libceph] [262673.968705] [<ffffffffc035c89e>] ceph_auth_destroy_authorizer+0x3e/0x60 [libceph] [262674.078852] [<ffffffffc0352805>] put_osd+0x45/0x80 [libceph] [262674.134249] [<ffffffffc035290e>] remove_osd+0xae/0x140 [libceph] [262674.189124] [<ffffffffc0352aa3>] __reset_osd+0x103/0x150 [libceph] [262674.243749] [<ffffffffc0354703>] kick_requests+0x223/0x460 [libceph] [262674.297485] [<ffffffffc03559e2>] ceph_osdc_handle_map+0x282/0x5e0 [libceph] [262674.350813] [<ffffffffc035022e>] dispatch+0x4e/0x720 [libceph] [262674.403312] [<ffffffffc034bd91>] try_read+0x3d1/0x1090 [libceph] [262674.454712] [<ffffffff810ab7c2>] ? dequeue_entity+0x152/0x690 [262674.505096] [<ffffffffc034cb1b>] con_work+0xcb/0x1300 [libceph] [262674.555104] [<ffffffff8108fb3e>] process_one_work+0x14e/0x3d0 [262674.604072] [<ffffffff810901ea>] worker_thread+0x11a/0x470 [262674.652187] [<ffffffff810900d0>] ? rescuer_thread+0x310/0x310 [262674.699022] [<ffffffff810957a2>] kthread+0xd2/0xf0 [262674.744494] [<ffffffff810956d0>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x1c0/0x1c0 [262674.789543] [<ffffffff817bd81f>] ret_from_fork+0x3f/0x70 [262674.834094] [<ffffffff810956d0>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x1c0/0x1c0 What happens is the following: (1) new MON session is established (2) old "none" ac is destroyed (3) new "cephx" ac is constructed ... (4) old OSD session (w/ "none" authorizer) is put ceph_auth_destroy_authorizer(ac, osd->o_auth.authorizer) osd->o_auth.authorizer in the "none" case is just a bare pointer into ac, which contains a single static copy for all services. By the time we get to (4), "none" ac, freed in (2), is long gone. On top of that, a new vtable installed in (3) points us at ceph_x_destroy_authorizer(), so we end up trying to destroy a "none" authorizer with a "cephx" destructor operating on invalid memory! To fix this, decouple authorizer destruction from ac and do away with a single static "none" authorizer by making a copy for each OSD or MDS session. Authorizers themselves are independent of ac and so there is no reason for destroy_authorizer() to be an ac op. Make it an op on the authorizer itself by turning ceph_authorizer into a real struct. Fixes: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/15447 Reported-by: Alan Zhang <alan.zhang@linux.com> Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Sage Weil <sage@redhat.com>
- Loading branch information
Showing
9 changed files
with
62 additions
and
65 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters