Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

In 1.14.3 it became client_config and .config was announced deprecated #1946

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 24, 2024

Conversation

yarikoptic
Copy link
Member

and caused .config to become None

and I believe that caused our tests to start failing etc

If tests succeed, Closes #1940

…d, caused it to become None

and I believe that caused our tests to start failing etc
@yarikoptic yarikoptic added the patch Increment the patch version when merged label May 24, 2024
@yarikoptic
Copy link
Member Author

ok, trivial fix seems to be . Makes our CI green. I will merge in an hour or so unless some @dandi/archive-maintainers would stop me. I am not marking for release although it might be desired happen our released instance would get that module updated.

@yarikoptic yarikoptic merged commit 288b854 into master May 24, 2024
11 checks passed
@yarikoptic yarikoptic deleted the bf-django-storage branch May 24, 2024 22:12
@mvandenburgh mvandenburgh self-assigned this Jun 3, 2024
Copy link
Member

@mvandenburgh mvandenburgh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM based on the changelog for django-storages ✔️

@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@
# Production-only
'django-composed-configuration[prod]>=0.23.0',
'django-s3-file-field[s3]>=1.0.0',
'django-storages[s3]>=1.14.2',
'django-storages[s3]>=1.14.3',
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just to note for future reference - I think in this case, a better approach would have been to pin this to the older version, i.e.
'django-storages[s3]==1.14.2',. In cases where we're unsure about a dependancy upgrade, we usually do that and add a TODO comment to look into it in the future.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yeah, i had it in mind too and agree it would have been safer, but given that we have already lots of things to be developed,

❯ git grep TODO | wc -l
69

and looking at the django-storages code decided that it was safe enough.

@dandibot
Copy link
Member

dandibot commented Jun 3, 2024

🚀 PR was released in v0.3.85 🚀

@dandibot dandibot added the released This issue/pull request has been released. label Jun 3, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kitware-please-review-whenever-back patch Increment the patch version when merged released This issue/pull request has been released.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

backend tests started to fail a week or so ago
3 participants