UNICODE font justification support #83
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
The resulting pdf will work only in some pdf viewers. I have prepared a solution, but unfortunatelly it needs support from pdfbox. Therefore I made a pull request for pdfbox. |
|
Thanks @backslash47 for looking at this. Hopefully, you can provide another pr when supported by pdfbox. Thanks again. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Text justification implemented in #3 will not work if using UNICODE fonts.
The reason is that Tw parameter (word spacing) is ignored for non simple fonts as defined in pdf standard at https://www.adobe.com/content/dam/Adobe/en/devnet/acrobat/pdfs/PDF32000_2008.pdf#651 page 253.
Therefore I reused the code from old iText output device which solved this problem.