Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update @types/jest to the latest version 🚀 #283

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 19, 2017

Conversation

greenkeeper[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@greenkeeper greenkeeper bot commented Jun 16, 2017

Version 20.0.0 of @types/jest just got published.

Dependency @types/jest
Current Version 19.2.4
Type devDependency

The version 20.0.0 is not covered by your current version range.

Without accepting this pull request your project will work just like it did before. There might be a bunch of new features, fixes and perf improvements that the maintainers worked on for you though.

I recommend you look into these changes and try to get onto the latest version of @types/jest.
Given that you have a decent test suite, a passing build is a strong indicator that you can take advantage of these changes by merging the proposed change into your project. Otherwise this branch is a great starting point for you to work on the update.


Not sure how things should work exactly?

There is a collection of frequently asked questions and of course you may always ask my humans.


Your Greenkeeper Bot 🌴

@DangerCI
Copy link

Warnings
⚠️

Please add a changelog entry for your changes.

⚠️

Please add your GitHub name to the changelog entry, so we can attribute you correctly.

⚠️

Changes were made to package.json, but not to yarn.lock.
Perhaps you need to run yarn install?

Generated by 🚫 dangerJS

@greenkeeper
Copy link
Contributor Author

greenkeeper bot commented Jun 19, 2017

Version 20.0.1 just got published.

Update to this version instead 🚀

@orta orta merged commit 9aa4ab8 into master Jun 19, 2017
@orta orta deleted the greenkeeper/@types/jest-20.0.0 branch June 19, 2017 21:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants