Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DAOSGCP-102 Changed packer scripts to use IAP with private IP #36

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 5, 2022
Merged

DAOSGCP-102 Changed packer scripts to use IAP with private IP #36

merged 2 commits into from
May 5, 2022

Conversation

markaolson
Copy link
Contributor

The images/build_images.sh script was setting up a firewall rule
to allow port 22 to 0.0.0.0/0. Packer was then using SSH to
configure the image. Removed the firewall rule and changed packer
to only use an internal IP and then use IAP tunnelling to
log into the instance via SSH.

Signed-off-by: Mark A. Olson mark.a.olson@intel.com

The images/build_images.sh script was setting up a firewall rule
to allow port 22 to 0.0.0.0/0.  Packer was then using SSH to
configure the image. Removed the firewall rule and changed packer
to only use an internal IP and then use IAP tunnelling to
log into the instance via SSH.

Signed-off-by: Mark A. Olson <mark.a.olson@intel.com>
cboneti
cboneti previously approved these changes May 4, 2022
Copy link
Collaborator

@cboneti cboneti left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks great, thanks for doing that!

Signed-off-by: Mark A. Olson <mark.a.olson@intel.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@lsitkiew lsitkiew left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me

@markaolson markaolson merged commit ffb544a into daos-stack:develop May 5, 2022
@markaolson markaolson deleted the DAOSGCP-102 branch May 5, 2022 18:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants