Experimental navbar feature merge

[4RGUS]

No description provided.

[PureInspect]

Astatinn's PureInspect™ Review Report

Project	Dappros | Ethora
Pull Request ID	#242
Author	Vineeth Nambiar
Title	Experimental navbar feature merge
Description	N/A
Lines Affected	+2,367 -136
Overview	🪲 Bug: 10+ Bugs 🔒 Vulnerability: 10+ Vulnerabilities. 🌀 Code Smell: 10+ Code Smells. 🔑 Security Hotspot: Security Hotspots not included in this package

IMPORTANT NOTE!

Astatinn PureInspect™ typically covers PRs up to 500 LoC in Basic Package.
Note that we won't skip the PR from review but with a basic package, you may lose some valuable insights for larger PRs as not all the code would be covered in detail.

Included in the Review

• Critical Error Review

This will be provided as part of Code Review comments on specific files

• Basic Architecture Review
• Framework Best Practice Review
• Basic Maintainability Review

This will be provided as part of this report (current comment)

---

Review Report Overview

Welcome Bonus

• Pull Request Insights
  Overall Insights
• Productivity & Continuous Improvement
  Insights that would boost team productivity and reduce the overall cost

Subject-Matter Expert Review

Subject-Matter Expert Insights on the Code and Architecture including the following:

• Basic Architecture Review
• Basic Maintainability Review
• Framework Best Practice Review

---

Welcome Bonus

Pull Request Insights

The subsequent segment furnishes a high-level synopsis of the Pull Request (PR) without delving into the finer details of the code and architectural intricacies.

The recommendations presented herein hold universal relevance, transcending project specifics, and technological contexts. These recommendations, focusing on enhancing clarity and precision, facilitate more effective collaboration among team members and reviewers, leading to a more insightful and valuable feedback exchange.

• Clear and Descriptive Title:
  The significance of a clear and descriptive PR title cannot be understated. It serves as a concise encapsulation of the purpose and breadth of the changes introduced by the PR. Its importance is multi-faceted:

  • Enhanced Understanding:
    A clear title acts as a quick reference point for reviewers and stakeholders, providing them with a preliminary grasp of the nature of the PR. This accessibility to the core purpose prevents unnecessary time expenditure in delving into intricate details.
  • Effective Task Linking:
    Connecting the PR with a specific task in an issue tracking system, such as JIRA, YouTrack, Trello, or others, is a commendable practice. It ensures that the work being done aligns with project goals and maintains traceability. This linkage aids in understanding the broader context and objectives of the PR.
  • Optimized Workflow:
    Leveraging tools like GitHub's automatic linking to your issue tracker, as configured in repository settings (settings/key_links), streamlines the development process. Developers are spared the effort of manually specifying links, allowing for a more organized and efficient workflow.

  Examples:
  Good example: ISSUEID-XXXX: Implement Experimental Navbar.
  In this example, the title clearly states the issue identifier (ISSUEID-XXXX) that this PR addresses, followed by a succinct description of the task: "Implement Experimental Navbar." This unambiguously communicates the purpose of the PR.

  Bad example: Experimental navbar feature merge
  The bad example lacks the specificity of the task or the issue identifier, making it less informative. It doesn't provide enough context to immediately understand the nature of the changes.

  Adhering to the practice of clear and descriptive PR titles, along with proper issue linking, promotes transparency, collaboration, and efficient workflow management, ultimately contributing to a more organized and effective development process.

• Brief Description:
  The PR description should provide context for the changes made.
  Why is it important? It should explain the problem being addressed, the solution proposed, and any potential impact or risks. A brief description helps reviewers understand the intent and aids in making informed decisions.

• Commit Cleanliness and Clarity:
  A pristine commit history is paramount to maintaining code quality and facilitating effective collaboration within a development team. Here are the key reasons why each PR should contain only commits directly pertinent to the changes requested for a specific task, along with clear and informative commit messages:

  • Traceability:
    A clean commit history ensures that each commit can be directly linked to a specific task or issue. This traceability aids in understanding the context and purpose of each change, making it easier to track the evolution of the codebase.
  • Isolation of Changes:
    By limiting the scope of commits within a PR to changes associated with the designated task, the review process becomes more focused. Reviewers can concentrate on specific modifications, leading to quicker and more accurate evaluations.
  • Readability and Collaboration:
    Well-crafted commit messages provide valuable insights into the nature of the changes made in a particular commit. This transparency improves the readability of the commit history, making it easier for other developers to comprehend the rationale behind each change. It also promotes effective collaboration by minimizing confusion and enhancing communication within the team.
  • Regression Prevention:
    Isolating commits to specific tasks helps prevent unintended side effects or regressions in the codebase. If an issue arises, it's easier to identify the root cause and roll back changes if necessary when each commit aligns with a well-defined task.

---

Best Practices:

• Atomic Commits:
  Break down changes into small, coherent commits that address a single task or issue. Each commit should represent a logically consistent and independent unit of work.
• Descriptive Commit Messages:
  Write clear, concise, and informative commit messages. Explain what was changed, why it was changed, and any relevant context. This aids not only in understanding the current state of the code but also in future maintenance.
• Squash and Rebase:
  When necessary, squash or rebase commits to ensure a clean and meaningful history before merging the PR. This practice helps eliminate unnecessary intermediate commits and keeps the history focused.

---

By adhering to these best practices, the commit history remains an invaluable asset for the development team, promoting transparency, collaboration, and the overall quality of the codebase.

---

Productivity & Continuous Improvement

• No automated checks have been found on this PR
  Why is it important? Automated checks play a crucial role in the pull request (PR) process, providing several benefits that complement the human review process. While expert human review remains invaluable, automated checks bring efficiency, consistency, and certain types of analysis that can significantly enhance the overall code quality and development workflow. Here's why automated checks are important:
  • Efficiency and Consistency:
    Automated checks can quickly identify common issues such as coding style violations, potential bugs, or basic syntactical errors. This ensures that basic quality standards are met consistently across the codebase without requiring manual inspection from subject matter experts.
  • Focus of Human Expertise:
    By offloading routine checks to automated systems, subject matter experts can focus their attention on more complex and critical aspects of the code. This optimizes their time and expertise, making the review process more effective.
  • Immediate Feedback:
    Automated checks provide rapid feedback to developers as soon as they submit a PR. This immediate feedback accelerates the development cycle, allowing developers to address issues promptly, and reducing the time taken for code review iterations.
  • Preventing Regressions:
    Automated tests, including unit tests and integration tests, help catch regressions, ensuring that new changes do not break existing functionality. This proactive approach prevents issues from being introduced into the codebase.
  • Standardization:
    Automated checks enforce coding standards and best practices consistently. This ensures that the codebase remains maintainable and readable by adhering to established guidelines.

Adapting to the Situation

While it's true that not all checks are suitable for every PR, having a set of well-chosen automated checks can greatly improve the development process. It's essential to strike a balance, ensuring that automated checks cover common and relevant aspects of code quality without burdening subject matter experts with unnecessary checks that may indeed be a waste of their time.

By configuring automated checks appropriately, you can optimize the PR review process, maintain high code quality, and allow your experts to focus on the aspects where their expertise truly shines, leading to a more efficient and effective development workflow.

PureInspect Immediate Proposal

Absolutely, taking a strategic and incremental approach to addressing issues is a wise practice in software development. By focusing on the most impactful and simplest solutions first, commonly referred to as "low-hanging fruit," you can achieve several valuable outcomes. Here's the list of initial Astatinn's PureInspect proposal:

• Continuous Integration (CI) Build:
  • Action:
    Build the React Native project from the source code on every pull request.
  • Purpose:
    Ensure that the project can be successfully built and that there are no compilation errors.
  • Benefits:
    Early detection of build issues, preventing broken builds in the main branch.
• Linting:
  • Action:
    Run code linters (e.g., ESLint) on the project.
  • Purpose:
    Enforce coding standards, detect potential issues, and maintain code consistency.
  • Benefits: Consistent code style, reduced bugs, and improved readability.
• Unit Testing:
  • Action:
    Execute unit tests (e.g., Jest) on the React Native components and functions.
  • Purpose:
    Verify that individual units of code function as expected.
  • Benefits:
    Immediate feedback on code quality and regression prevention.
• UI Testing:
  • Action:
    Perform UI tests (e.g., using Detox) on the React Native app.
  • Purpose:
    Ensure the app's UI components and interactions work as intended.
  • Benefits:
    Improved user experience and fewer user-facing issues.

Note that there are at least 5 more automations that are crucial for high-quality development and that can reduce overall cost of the project and provide early feedback but the above mentioned are the once that should be implemented immediately and that are relatively simple to address (especially the first two).

• No clear context or proof of work is available
  It is extremely valuable for everyone looking at the deliverables from engineering team to have a clear context of what was being done and that it in fact work as expected. Though this would partially be covered by automated tests and builds we still have a risk of missing something (natural when humans are working on something). That being said, here are few simple proposals from Astatinn's PureInspect to ensure everyone understands the context and to help developer not miss something by accident:

  • Provide a short demo video (e.g., Loom) going trough the implemented changes
  • Provide a short summary of what was manually tested.

Why is this important?

This approach serves two essential purposes:

• Firstly, it empowers developers to review their work meticulously before submission.
• Secondly, it provides team managers with comprehensive insights into the development and testing process, enabling them to identify areas for improvement. This can lead to the implementation of targeted tools, especially in cases where developers face challenges or invest excessive effort. Ultimately, this approach drives the engineering team to operate more efficiently and make informed decisions, prioritizing enhancements to the overall process for smarter work practices rather than resorting to unnecessary additional efforts.

---

Subject-Matter Expert Review

Basic Architecture Review

• Structured and Reusable Repository Structure with Nrwl Nx (or similar tools)
  Switching to a more structured and reusable repository structure, such as using Nx by Nrwl, can greatly enhance the development and maintainability of your React Native application. Nx introduces the concept of "apps" and "libs" which promotes modularity and separation of concerns. Here's why this is crucial:
  • Modularity:
    By organizing your code into smaller, reusable "libs," you can create a more modular architecture. Each "lib" can represent a specific domain, functionality, or shared component. This makes it easier to manage, test, and update individual parts of your application without affecting the whole codebase.
  • Code Sharing:
    Nx allows you to share code between different apps and libs, which reduces duplication and enforces consistency across the project. This also makes it easier to develop features that span multiple parts of the application.
  • Improved Collaboration:
    With a structured repository, your team members can work more independently on different parts of the application. This reduces conflicts and makes it easier to parallelize development efforts; this is really useful when it comes to open-source projects with many contributors.
  • Scalability:
    As your application grows, a well-organized repository structure ensures that the codebase remains maintainable and doesn't become an obstacle to further development.
• Leverage Third-Party Components:
  It's essential to leverage third-party components and libraries whenever possible instead of building your own. Here's why:
  • Time Efficiency:
    Third-party components are already built, tested, and maintained by experienced developers. Using them saves us a significant amount of development time compared to building everything from scratch.
  • Quality:
    Many popular third-party components have a large user base, which means they are thoroughly tested in various scenarios and are likely to be of higher quality and reliability.
  • Focus on Core Features:
    Building your own components takes time and resources. Leveraging third-party components allows us to focus on building the unique features and functionality that differentiate our app, rather than reinventing common UI elements.
  • Maintenance:
    Third-party components come with updates and improvements, often addressing security issues and performance optimizations. We can benefit from these updates without investing additional effort.

Basic Maintainability Review

• App Structure and Layered Architecture:
  Splitting the app into well-defined layers following the single responsibility and separation of concerns principles has several advantages:
  • Maintainability:
    A layered architecture makes it easier to locate and update specific parts of the application. Changes or enhancements to one layer won't ripple through the entire codebase, reducing the risk of introducing bugs.
  • Scalability:
    By separating concerns into different layers (data, core service, feature services, etc.), we can scale the application more efficiently. We can optimize and scale each layer independently, which is crucial for larger applications.
  • Flexibility:
    A layered architecture allows us to swap out or upgrade components in one layer without affecting others. This flexibility is essential as technologies evolve, and we need to adapt.
  • Code Organization:
    A structured layer approach improves the overall organization of the code, making it easier for new developers to understand the architecture and contribute effectively.

Incorporating these principles and practices will not only improve the current state of the React Native application but also set a strong foundation for its future growth and maintainability.

Framework Best Practice Review

Though some of the items below may sound trivial, your project unfortunately last these which drastically degrades the quality of the product or it causes a significant cost of maintaining it without the following:

• Code Consistency:
  Enforce a consistent code style and structure across the project. Consistency improves readability, reduces errors, and helps contributors seamlessly work together regardless of their individual coding preferences.
• Clear Documentation:
  Document your code, APIs, and project setup thoroughly. Good documentation helps new contributors understand the project quickly, encourages more contributions, and ensures the project remains accessible to a wider audience.
• Automated Testing:
  Implement automated testing for critical functionality. This practice catches regressions, improves code quality, and provides a safety net for future changes, ensuring that the project remains robust over time.
• Accessibility Considerations:
  Ensure your app is accessible to users with disabilities. Prioritize accessible design and follow accessibility guidelines to make your app inclusive and compliant with industry standards.

Each of these best practices contributes to the success of an open-source React Native project. They simplify development, enhance collaboration, and ensure the project remains maintainable, secure, and responsive to the needs of both users and contributors.

---

Additional Insights (Outside single PR)

---

IMPORTANT NOTE:
Astatinn's PureInspect typically operates in two distinct modes:

• Single PR Review:
  This mode is centered around a thorough examination of a specific PR, with a focus on providing rapid feedback.
• Full Architecture Review:
  This mode encompasses a comprehensive evaluation of the entire project, primarily conducted before a release.

---

Given that this marks our initial collaboration with your project in a "trial" capacity, we would like to introduce a few additional points that extend beyond the scope of a single PR review. However, it's essential to acknowledge that the "trial" mode does not encompass the entirety of architecture reviews. Hence, the insights shared below represent a limited subset of our observations. As part of the PR review you choose, only Basic Architecture Review is included, but we want to give you a quick peak into additional Architecture reviews our team can also provide as part of Full Architecture Review mode.

---

Your project has an extensive list of dependencies, and it's essential to periodically review and optimize the dependencies to ensure the project's performance, maintainability, and security. I'll provide some insights on the current dependencies and suggest potential enhancements:

• Consider Dependency Usage:
  It's crucial to evaluate the necessity of each dependency. Ensure that the libraries you're using are essential for the project and that you're not carrying unnecessary bloat.
• Update Dependencies:
  Always keep your dependencies up-to-date to benefit from bug fixes, security updates, and performance improvements. Some of your dependencies might have newer versions available, and updating them periodically can enhance the overall quality of your project.
• Deprecation and Compatibility:
  Keep an eye on any deprecated or outdated libraries. It's essential to switch to alternatives or update the dependencies that are no longer maintained or compatible with the latest versions of React Native.
• Minimize Overlaps:
  Review the functionality provided by each dependency and check if there are overlaps. If you have multiple libraries providing similar features, consider consolidating to reduce complexity and potential conflicts.
• Minimize Overlaps:
  Review the functionality provided by each dependency and check if there are overlaps. If you have multiple libraries providing similar features, consider consolidating to reduce complexity and potential conflicts.
• Type Definitions and Typing:
  Ensure that you have proper type definitions for your dependencies. This is crucial for maintaining a type-safe codebase, especially when using TypeScript.
• Unused Dependencies:
  Regularly audit your project for unused dependencies. Removing unused dependencies reduces the bundle size and makes the project easier to maintain.
• Consider Alternatives:
  Review whether there are more efficient or popular alternatives available for some of the functionalities provided by your current dependencies.

Remember that while dependencies can be incredibly beneficial for speeding up development and adding features, they also come with the cost of increasing the complexity of your project. A balance between functionality, performance, and maintainability is essential. Regularly review and optimize your dependencies to ensure that they align with the project's goals and evolve with the latest best practices in the React Native ecosystem.

Please be aware that Astatinn's PureInspect has the capability to provide further assistance with these reviews. It can also help streamline your codebase by identifying specific libraries that may be updated within your project.

[PureInspect]

Object Initialization and Mutation:
The code initializes a metaRoom object and then mutates it by setting properties based on params.metaDirection. While the overall logic is clear, it's generally better to avoid direct object mutation, especially when dealing with shared objects like arrays or objects in a potentially asynchronous context. Instead, create a new object with the desired properties.

if (params?.metaDirection) {
  const linkKey = 'link' + params.metaDirection;
  const oppositeLinkKey = 'link' + getOpositeDirection(params.metaDirection);
  const metaRoom = {
    name: chatName,
    description: chatDescription,
    idAddress: roomHash,
    meta: true,
    [linkKey]: roomHash,
    [oppositeLinkKey]: params.metaRoom.idAddress,
  };
  const cachedMetaRooms = await asyncStorageGetItem('metaRooms');
  const metaRoomsList = cachedMetaRooms || [...metaRooms]; // Create a new array to avoid direct mutation
  metaRoomsList.push(metaRoom);
  console.log(metaRoomsList, 'akkjalfjsd');
  await asyncStorageSetItem('metaRooms', metaRoomsList);
}

Error Handling:
The code lacks proper error handling. If an error occurs during asyncStorageGetItem or asyncStorageSetItem, it will not be caught, potentially leading to silent failures.

try {
  if (params?.metaDirection) {
    // ... (existing code)
    await asyncStorageSetItem('metaRooms', metaRoomsList);
  }
  navigation.navigate(ROUTES.CHAT, {
    chatJid: roomHash + apiStore.xmppDomains.CONFERENCEDOMAIN,
  });
} catch (error) {
  // Handle the error, e.g., log it or show a user-friendly message
  console.error('Error:', error);
}

[PureInspect]

Your provided code is quite extensive and encompasses a variety of functionalities within a React Native component. We'll do one step review here for now, focusing on what's wrong, simplicity, and best practices. Since this is a large codebase, we'll highlight some key points rather than going through every single line in detail.

PLEASE NOTE

Consider checking general reviews, especially around simple and smaller PRs and layered architecture as it is a best practice and can help teams and reviewers deliver products faster and with higher confidence.

---

What's wrong?

• Code Duplication:
  There seems to be some code duplication for similar functionality. This can lead to maintenance issues and makes the code harder to understand. Look for opportunities to create reusable functions or components.
• Component Structure:
  The component is quite large, which can make it harder to maintain and debug. Consider breaking it into smaller, more manageable components, especially if different parts of the component have distinct responsibilities.
• State Management:
  The component has a large number of state variables. Be mindful of the state management approach you're using. Consider using a state management library like Mobx, Redux, or React Context API to simplify and centralize state management.
• Async/Await Handling:
  Ensure that you handle errors properly when using async/await, particularly in cases where API calls or asynchronous operations are being performed.

Simplicity

• Extract Logic:
  Consider extracting complex logic into separate functions or utilities to improve readability and maintainability.
• Component Composition:
  As mentioned earlier, break down this large component into smaller, focused components. Each component should ideally have a single responsibility.
• Simplify Dependencies:
  Be careful with the number of dependencies and imports in the component. Keep it simple and import only what you need for the component to function.

Best Practices

• Type Safety:
  Use TypeScript if you're not already. TypeScript can help catch many errors at compile-time, improving the overall quality of your code.
• Component Naming:
  Ensure your component names are clear and descriptive. Names like "ChatScreen" are good, but make sure the purpose of each component is immediately understandable.
• Error Handling:
  Implement proper error handling for asynchronous operations. Use try-catch blocks or .catch() for Promises to handle errors gracefully.
• Optimize Rerenders:
  Use React.memo and useMemo to optimize component rerenders and avoid unnecessary computations.
• Separation of Concerns:
  Ensure that your component has a clear separation of concerns. Separate UI rendering logic from data fetching and other operations.
• Consistent Formatting:
  Maintain consistent code formatting throughout the component. This improves readability and collaboration.
• Documentation:
  Consider adding comments to complex or non-obvious sections of your code to explain the purpose and behavior.
• Testing:
  Implement tests for your component, especially for critical functionalities. This will help catch regressions and ensure the component works as expected.

[PureInspect]

Exclude commented code from a pull request (PR):
Excluding commented-out code from PR is a good practice in software development. Here are the main reasons why commented code should generally be omitted from a PR:

• Code Clutter:
  Commented code adds unnecessary clutter to the PR. It can make the codebase harder to read and understand for other developers reviewing the changes. Clean and concise code is easier to maintain and collaborate on.
• Readability:
  Code comments are typically meant to provide context or explanations for the active code. When code is commented out, it can lead to confusion, as it's not immediately clear whether the commented-out code is still relevant or if it's just old code that's no longer in use. This ambiguity can lead to misunderstandings or even mistakes when reviewing the PR.
• Version Control:
  Modern version control systems (like Git; GitHub in your case) track the history of changes in a codebase. When code is commented out, it remains in the version history, and there's no need to clutter the current state of the code with commented-out code. If the commented-out code is relevant in the future, it can always be retrieved from the version history.
• Maintenance Overhead:
  Commented code requires maintenance. If the code isn't going to be reactivated soon, it can become outdated or incompatible with the current codebase. It's better to remove such code entirely, reducing the maintenance overhead.
• Focus on the Active Code:
  When reviewing a PR, the focus should be on the active changes that are being proposed. Commented-out code is not part of the immediate changes and can distract from the primary purpose of the PR.
• Misleading Intent:
  Commented-out code might give the impression that the code was intentionally excluded or disabled temporarily. This can lead to confusion if it's not reactivated, and it might be left there indefinitely, adding to the technical debt.

In summary, excluding commented code from a PR helps improve code clarity, maintainability, and collaboration. If there's a valid reason to keep a record of the commented-out code (e.g., for historical context), it's best to do so in the version control history, not in the active codebase being reviewed in the PR.

[PureInspect]

Excluding console.log from production code is a good practice. While console.log is very useful for debugging and understanding the behavior of your code during development, it should not be present in production code for several reasons:

• Performance:
  Excessive use of console.log statements, especially in loops or frequently executed functions, can significantly impact the performance of your application. This impact is more noticeable in resource-constrained environments such as mobile devices.
• Security:
  Leaving debugging information in production code might expose sensitive data or implementation details, which could be exploited by malicious actors.
• Clean Code:
  Production code should be clean, concise, and optimized. Unnecessary console.log statements can clutter the codebase and make it harder to read and maintain.
• Logging Strategy:
  In a production environment, it's better to have a proper logging strategy that includes logging errors and important events to a designated logging system or service, not just printing messages to the console. This allows you to track issues more effectively and provides better control over logging levels.

For these reasons, it's a best practice to remove or disable console.log statements in production code. If you need to keep some level of logging for debugging purposes in production, you should use a logging library that provides better control over logging levels, such as enabling debug mode only when necessary and allowing you to easily disable or configure logging in a production environment.

[PureInspect]

Possible Improvements

• Documentation:
  Although this code seems to be a part of a larger application, it lacks comments explaining the purpose of the function, its arguments, and the overall audio recording process. Adding a brief comment or function header would greatly improve its readability and maintainability.
• Error Handling:
  The code should have error handling for the await statement (e.g., using a try/catch block) to handle any potential errors that might occur during the audio recording process.

Here's an improved version of the code that addresses some of these points:

**
 * Starts the audio recording process.
 * @param {string} path - The file path for the recorded audio.
 */
const onStartRecord = async (path) => {
    try {
        // Set recording state and animate media button
        setRecording(true);
        animateMediaButtonIn();

        // Configure audio recording settings
        const audioSettings = {
            AudioEncoderAndroid: AudioEncoderAndroidType.AAC,
            AudioSourceAndroid: AudioSourceAndroidType.MIC,
            AVEncoderAudioQualityKeyIOS: AVEncoderAudioQualityIOSType.low,
            AVNumberOfChannelsKeyIOS: 2,
            AVFormatIDKeyIOS: AVEncodingOption.aac,
        };

        // Start audio recorder
        const result = await startRecorder(path, audioSettings, true);
    } catch (error) {
        Reactotron.error('An error occurred while starting the audio recorder:', error);
    }
};

Please note that the Reactotron is just an example tool you may use for logging which is particularly useful for React Native development. However, you may use other tools such as Sentry or similar.

To use Reactotron in your React Native project

• Install Reactotron packages

npm install reactotron-react-native reactotron-redux

• Set up Reactotron in your app's entry point

import Reactotron from 'reactotron-react-native';
import { reactotronRedux } from 'reactotron-redux';

if (__DEV__) {
  Reactotron.configure() // Use default options or configure as needed
    .useReactNative()
    .use(reactotronRedux())
    .connect();
  Reactotron.clear();
}

However, note that you already have it installed in your project but it is not enforced.

[PureInspect]

This is something we already pointed out before, please, do not include commented code in the PR.
It happened several times so there is no point of repeating the same comments but we just want to emphasize the issue as it's not only once.

[PureInspect]

Possible Improvements

• Function Composition:
  The renderAttachment function has several responsibilities bundled together: it determines the available options based on the length of walletStore.nftItems, it defines the actions for each option, and it renders the UI. It's generally a good practice to separate concerns and keep functions focused on a single task.
• Readability:
  The code could benefit from better indentation and spacing to improve readability. Consider using consistent indentation, adding blank lines between logical sections, and organizing the code in a more structured manner.
• Inline Arrow Functions:
  The actions for the options are defined as inline arrow functions. While this is concise, it can make the code less readable, especially when the actions become more complex. Consider extracting these actions into separate functions for better clarity.
• Hardcoded Styles:
  The inline styles for the View and Actions components are hardcoded. It's generally better to use a style sheet or extract the styles into variables for reusability and easier maintenance.
• Use of async/await:
  The usage of async/await for the actions may be unnecessary in this context unless there's a specific reason for waiting on these actions to complete.
• Hardcoded Text:
  The labels for the options ('Upload File', 'Display an Item', 'Cancel') are hardcoded in the component. It's a good practice to move such text strings to a separate localization file or at least extract them as constants to make the code more maintainable.