Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(query): implement HAVERSINE #15971

Merged
merged 13 commits into from
Jul 5, 2024
Merged

Conversation

kkk25641463
Copy link
Contributor

@kkk25641463 kkk25641463 commented Jul 4, 2024

I hereby agree to the terms of the CLA available at: https://docs.databend.com/dev/policies/cla/

Summary

feat: Implement HAVERSINE #15413

Tests

  • Unit Test
  • Logic Test
  • Benchmark Test
  • No Test - Explain why

Type of change

  • Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking Change (fix or feature that could cause existing functionality not to work as expected)
  • Documentation Update
  • Refactoring
  • Performance Improvement
  • Other (please describe):

This change is Reviewable

Signed-off-by: Fan Yang <yangfanlinux@gmail.com>
@github-actions github-actions bot added the pr-feature this PR introduces a new feature to the codebase label Jul 4, 2024
Signed-off-by: Fan Yang <yangfanlinux@gmail.com>
# Conflicts:
#	src/query/functions/src/scalars/geometry.rs
@b41sh b41sh self-requested a review July 4, 2024 05:43
Copy link
Member

@b41sh b41sh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, please fix ci tests.

@b41sh b41sh added this pull request to the merge queue Jul 5, 2024
Merged via the queue into databendlabs:main with commit 7dcd6ee Jul 5, 2024
73 checks passed
@kkk25641463 kkk25641463 deleted the HAVERSINE branch July 6, 2024 13:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
pr-feature this PR introduces a new feature to the codebase
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants