Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(cli): Add run-id option to put sub-command #11023

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jul 31, 2024
Merged

Conversation

pedro93
Copy link
Collaborator

@pedro93 pedro93 commented Jul 29, 2024

Adds an option to assign run-id to a given put command execution. This is useful when transformers do not exist for a given ingestion payload, we can follow up with custom metadata and assign it to an ingestion pipeline.

Checklist

  • The PR conforms to DataHub's Contributing Guideline (particularly Commit Message Format)
  • Links to related issues (if applicable)
  • Tests for the changes have been added/updated (if applicable)
  • Docs related to the changes have been added/updated (if applicable). If a new feature has been added a Usage Guide has been added for the same.
  • For any breaking change/potential downtime/deprecation/big changes an entry has been made in Updating DataHub

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Introduced a new optional parameter for system metadata in the entity posting functionality, enhancing metadata ingestion capabilities.
    • Added a run_id parameter for aspect and platform functions, allowing for better tracking of metadata changes associated with specific runs.
    • Introduced a new command-line option for specifying run-id, improving user experience during invocation.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 29, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent updates enhance metadata ingestion capabilities by introducing optional parameters for system metadata and run IDs. These improvements facilitate better tracking and management of metadata changes, enriching the data handling process. Key functions are now more versatile, allowing users to provide essential context during metadata operations, which bolsters overall utility and traceability.

Changes

Files Change Summary
.../cli/cli_utils.py Added system_metadata parameter to post_entity function, enabling the inclusion of system metadata in entity proposals. Updated proposal dictionary accordingly.
.../cli/put_cli.py Enhanced aspect and platform functions by adding run_id parameter for improved tracking of updates. Integrated run_id into system metadata proposals and CLI options.

Poem

In the garden of code where changes grow,
A sprinkle of metadata helps our queries flow.
With run IDs dancing like bunnies in play,
We track every hop, come what may!
So let’s celebrate this leap, oh so spry,
For metadata’s magic will surely fly high! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the ingestion PR or Issue related to the ingestion of metadata label Jul 29, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
metadata-ingestion/src/datahub/cli/cli_utils.py (1)

Line range hint 169-191:
Reminder: Add tests.

The function post_entity is missing test coverage.

Do you want me to generate the unit testing code or open a GitHub issue to track this task?

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between a09575f and ea0295b.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • metadata-ingestion/src/datahub/cli/cli_utils.py (3 hunks)
  • metadata-ingestion/src/datahub/cli/put_cli.py (5 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (3)
metadata-ingestion/src/datahub/cli/put_cli.py (2)

Line range hint 42-60:
LGTM! But verify the function usage in the codebase.

The code changes are approved.

However, ensure that all function calls to aspect match the new signature.


Line range hint 91-117:
LGTM! But verify the function usage in the codebase.

The code changes are approved.

However, ensure that all function calls to platform match the new signature.

metadata-ingestion/src/datahub/cli/cli_utils.py (1)

Line range hint 169-191:
LGTM! But verify the function usage in the codebase.

The code changes are approved.

However, ensure that all function calls to post_entity match the new signature.

Verification successful

Verification Successful: Function calls to post_entity match the new signature.

The function post_entity is correctly used with the new signature in the following files:

  • smoke-test/tests/timeline/timeline_test.py
  • metadata-ingestion/src/datahub/cli/put_cli.py
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all function calls to `post_entity` match the new signature.

# Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature.
rg --type python -A 5 $'post_entity'

Length of output: 66


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all function calls to `post_entity` match the new signature.

# Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature.
rg -A 5 'post_entity'

Length of output: 2908

Comment on lines 39 to 42
@click.option("--run-id", type=str, help="Run ID into which we should log the aspect.")
@upgrade.check_upgrade
@telemetry.with_telemetry()
def aspect(urn: str, aspect: str, aspect_data: str) -> None:
def aspect(urn: str, aspect: str, aspect_data: str, run_id: str) -> None:
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reminder: Add tests.

The function aspect is missing test coverage.

Do you want me to generate the unit testing code or open a GitHub issue to track this task?

Comment on lines +87 to +91
@click.option(
"--run-id", type=str, help="Run ID into which we should log the platform."
)
def platform(
ctx: click.Context, name: str, display_name: Optional[str], logo: str
ctx: click.Context, name: str, display_name: Optional[str], logo: str, run_id: str
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reminder: Add tests.

The function platform is missing test coverage.

Do you want me to generate the unit testing code or open a GitHub issue to track this task?

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between ea0295b and aa141f6.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • metadata-ingestion/src/datahub/cli/cli_utils.py (3 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • metadata-ingestion/src/datahub/cli/cli_utils.py

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between aa141f6 and 3d3459a.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • metadata-ingestion/src/datahub/cli/cli_utils.py (3 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • metadata-ingestion/src/datahub/cli/cli_utils.py

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3d3459a and 11b4eeb.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • metadata-ingestion/src/datahub/cli/put_cli.py (6 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • metadata-ingestion/src/datahub/cli/put_cli.py

@pedro93 pedro93 enabled auto-merge (squash) July 31, 2024 12:19
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 11b4eeb and 18c2cb7.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • metadata-ingestion/src/datahub/cli/put_cli.py (6 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • metadata-ingestion/src/datahub/cli/put_cli.py

@pedro93 pedro93 merged commit 1955c05 into master Jul 31, 2024
48 of 49 checks passed
@pedro93 pedro93 deleted the feature/cus-2323 branch July 31, 2024 12:29
This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ingestion PR or Issue related to the ingestion of metadata
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants