Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(cli): Trim report of dataHubExecutionRequestResult to max GMS size #11051

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jul 31, 2024

Conversation

pedro93
Copy link
Collaborator

@pedro93 pedro93 commented Jul 31, 2024

When ingestion jobs have a large log output (i.e. debug logging enabled), the request to send the dataHubExecutionRequestResult aspect will fail with 413 payload too large error.

This will then cause the entire job to exit with status 1, even if the ingestion logic itself run was successful.

Checklist

  • The PR conforms to DataHub's Contributing Guideline (particularly Commit Message Format)
  • Links to related issues (if applicable)
  • Tests for the changes have been added/updated (if applicable)
  • Docs related to the changes have been added/updated (if applicable). If a new feature has been added a Usage Guide has been added for the same.
  • For any breaking change/potential downtime/deprecation/big changes an entry has been made in Updating DataHub

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Introduced a new --run-id parameter for the put command, allowing users to associate data writes with specific ingestion processes.
  • Improvements
    • Updated ingestion reports to limit summary text to a maximum of 800,000 characters to prevent oversized payloads.
    • Revised configuration management to align with the DatahubClientConfig, requiring users to initialize or set environment variables for configuration.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 31, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent updates to the DataHub CLI bring important enhancements for managing data ingestion. A new --run-id parameter in the put command improves tracking of ingestion processes. Ingestion reports are now capped at 800,000 characters to prevent payload issues. Additionally, configuration management has been enhanced, requiring users to initialize the ~/.datahubenv file manually, which streamlines the configuration process.

Changes

Files Change Summary
docs/how/updating-datahub.md, metadata-ingestion/src/datahub/... Introduced --run-id parameter in the put command for improved ingestion tracking, updated ingestion report logic to truncate summaries to 800,000 characters, and revised configuration file handling to require user initialization.

Poem

In the garden of data, we hop and play,
New features sprout bright, in a wondrous display.
With --run-id guiding each step that we take,
And summaries trimmed for a lighter intake.
Let's dance through the fields, our joy we will share,
For every change whispers, "We care!" 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added ingestion PR or Issue related to the ingestion of metadata docs Issues and Improvements to docs labels Jul 31, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (2)
docs/how/updating-datahub.md (2)

84-84: Possible missing article.

Consider revising the sentence for clarity.

- mimick transformers when a transformer for aspect being written does not exist.
+ mimic transformers when a transformer for the aspect being written does not exist.
Tools
LanguageTool

[uncategorized] ~84-~84: Possible missing article found.
Context: ...ick transformers when a transformer for aspect being written does not exist. - #11051 ...

(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_THE)


85-85: Document the character limit for summary text.

The documentation should clearly state the reason for limiting the summary text to 800,000 characters to avoid generating oversized dataHubExecutionRequestResult objects.

- Ingestion reports will now trim the summary text to a maximum of 800k characters to avoid generating `dataHubExecutionRequestResult` that are too large for GMS to handle.
+ Ingestion reports will now trim the summary text to a maximum of 800,000 characters to avoid generating `dataHubExecutionRequestResult` objects that are too large for GMS to handle.
Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1955c05 and 2ec93a6.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • docs/how/updating-datahub.md (1 hunks)
  • metadata-ingestion/src/datahub/ingestion/reporting/datahub_ingestion_run_summary_provider.py (1 hunks)
Additional context used
LanguageTool
docs/how/updating-datahub.md

[uncategorized] ~84-~84: Possible missing article found.
Context: ...ick transformers when a transformer for aspect being written does not exist. - #11051 ...

(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_THE)

Additional comments not posted (1)
metadata-ingestion/src/datahub/ingestion/reporting/datahub_ingestion_run_summary_provider.py (1)

212-214: Ensure the truncation logic is correct.

The truncation logic ensures that the summary does not exceed 800,000 characters. This approach mitigates the risk of exceeding GMS's payload limit.

However, consider adding a comment to explain why 800,000 characters were chosen as the limit for future maintainability.

@pedro93 pedro93 enabled auto-merge (squash) July 31, 2024 16:37
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2ec93a6 and 8b387b7.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • metadata-ingestion/src/datahub/ingestion/reporting/datahub_ingestion_run_summary_provider.py (3 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (1)
metadata-ingestion/src/datahub/ingestion/reporting/datahub_ingestion_run_summary_provider.py (1)

214-216: Ensure truncation logic is appropriate.

The truncation logic retains only the last 800,000 characters of the summary. Verify that this does not remove critical information from the summary.

@pedro93 pedro93 merged commit e14dc91 into master Jul 31, 2024
47 of 50 checks passed
@pedro93 pedro93 deleted the feature/cus-2162 branch July 31, 2024 17:45
This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
docs Issues and Improvements to docs ingestion PR or Issue related to the ingestion of metadata
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants