-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore(vulnerability): Insecure randomness #11058
Conversation
WalkthroughThe recent updates enhance the security of random value generation across multiple test files by replacing pseudo-random methods with cryptographically secure alternatives. This change ensures that identifiers such as Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant A as User
participant B as System
participant C as CryptoAPI
A->>B: Request Random Identifier
B->>C: Generate Secure Random Value
C-->>B: Return Secure Random Value
B-->>A: Provide Random Identifier
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (4)
- smoke-test/tests/cypress/cypress/e2e/mutations/dataset_ownership.js (1 hunks)
- smoke-test/tests/cypress/cypress/e2e/mutations/ingestion_source.js (1 hunks)
- smoke-test/tests/cypress/cypress/e2e/mutations/managing_secrets.js (1 hunks)
- smoke-test/tests/cypress/cypress/e2e/settings/managing_groups.js (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (4)
smoke-test/tests/cypress/cypress/e2e/mutations/ingestion_source.js (1)
1-1
: LGTM! Improved security with cryptographically secure random number generation.The change from
Math.random()
tocrypto.getRandomValues(new Uint32Array(1))[0]
enhances the security by using a cryptographically secure method for generating random numbers.smoke-test/tests/cypress/cypress/e2e/mutations/dataset_ownership.js (1)
1-1
: LGTM! Improved security with cryptographically secure randomtest_id
generation.The change from
Math.random()
tocrypto.getRandomValues(new Uint32Array(1))[0]
enhances the security by using a cryptographically secure method for generating randomtest_id
.smoke-test/tests/cypress/cypress/e2e/settings/managing_groups.js (1)
1-1
: LGTM! Improved security with cryptographically secure randomtest_id
generation.The change from
Math.random()
tocrypto.getRandomValues(new Uint32Array(1))[0]
enhances the security by using a cryptographically secure method for generating randomtest_id
.smoke-test/tests/cypress/cypress/e2e/mutations/managing_secrets.js (1)
1-1
: Improved Security: Use of Cryptographically Secure Random Number GenerationThe change from
Math.floor(Math.random() * 100000)
tocrypto.getRandomValues(new Uint32Array(1))[0]
enhances the security of random number generation by using a cryptographically secure method.
@david-leifker thank you for your help. The changes are in test files using a different random generator. Do you need any more info to approve this PR? |
lgtm! |
@david-leifker - Thanks for reviewing the PR. Can you please approve and merge. |
Checklist
Background:
CodeQL scans detect high vulnerability in the code base. Its due to using random number in a security context. Although the change is made in a test file, CodeQL detects it as vulnerability and by resolving this, the overall vulnerabilty score improves. And it had no impact on the existing tests.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes