blackhat: new formula #35
Conversation
|
I don't think that I can accept this formula because BlackHat is not open source. The tarball that you link to is not advertised on their website. |
[ci skip]
|
I see what you mean. We should be discussing this with the authors, but I don't feel like I'm not up to the task at the moment. If anyone wants to do that, please, go ahead. Maybe some compromise can be reached if we put a notice to the formula's caveats section saying that this software is not a public release. |
|
I think it would be worth looking into integrating OpenLoops and Sherpa, if possible. Especially with the growing popularity of Sherpa 2.2.0. I will see if I can write a formula for OpenLoops. |
|
Last time I've checked they had some homegrown module packaging system. At the time it appeared to me that one would have to either reinvent it in ruby or just repackage a tree that was already bootstrapped. Btw. I've noticed that your affiliation is IU. I've just started at the same place, it would be interesting to meet you. |
|
Yeah, the "scons" module was new to me. Thats why I avoided writing one haha. Maybe I will take another look. That is interesting! Who are you working with? I work with the HEP-ATLAS group. You can just email me directly so that we are not spamming the thread. |
No description provided.