Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add merge exclude tests -- use adapter zone test  #227

Merged
merged 18 commits into from
Feb 8, 2023

Conversation

dave-connors-3
Copy link
Contributor

@dave-connors-3 dave-connors-3 commented Jul 20, 2022

resolves #5260 (dbt-core issue)

Description

This PR adds integration tests for the associated logic change in dbt-core PR #5457

Related PRs:

Checklist

  • I have signed the CLA
  • I have run this code in development and it appears to resolve the stated issue
  • This PR includes tests, or tests are not required/relevant for this PR
  • I have updated the CHANGELOG.md and added information about my change to the "dbt-bigquery next" section.

@McKnight-42 McKnight-42 self-requested a review July 25, 2022 19:29
@jtcohen6 jtcohen6 added the ready_for_review Externally contributed PR has functional approval, ready for code review from Core engineering label Aug 4, 2022
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you for your pull request! We could not find a changelog entry for this change. For details on how to document a change, see the dbt-bigquery contributing guide.

@VersusFacit
Copy link
Contributor

I assume this will be unpinned and sent back to main before merge?

@dave-connors-3
Copy link
Contributor Author

@VersusFacit that's the idea! once dbt-core is rocking and rolling, we can unpin and re-test

@@ -93,5 +93,4 @@ def test__bigquery__incremental_merge_columns(self):
"seed-paths": ["seeds-merge-cols-update"]
})
self.seed_and_run()
self.assertTablesEqual("incremental_update_cols", "expected_result")

self.assertTablesEqual("incremental_update_cols", "expected_result")
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

good auto formatting lol

Copy link
Contributor

@VersusFacit VersusFacit left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM (barring the changeback on the dev requirements once we complete hashing out the adapter zone class)

@VersusFacit VersusFacit merged commit db6b527 into main Feb 8, 2023
@VersusFacit VersusFacit deleted the feature/merge-exclude-columns branch February 8, 2023 21:12
@VersusFacit VersusFacit changed the title Feature/merge exclude columns add merge exclude tests Feb 8, 2023
@VersusFacit VersusFacit changed the title add merge exclude tests add merge exclude tests -- use adapter zone test  Feb 8, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cla:yes ready_for_review Externally contributed PR has functional approval, ready for code review from Core engineering
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants