Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

use a subselect instead of a CTE when building incremental models #785

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 8, 2018

Conversation

joevandyk
Copy link
Contributor

(must faster on postgresql due to the CTE optimization fence)

@joevandyk
Copy link
Contributor Author

should we add a comment as to why not using a CTE here?

@drewbanin
Copy link
Contributor

sure @joevandyk - a comment couldn't hurt! This looks good to me, happy to merge after you add a comment :)

Thanks for the contribution!

(must faster on postgresql due to the CTE optimization fence)
@drewbanin
Copy link
Contributor

merging!

@joevandyk
Copy link
Contributor Author

should i have made the pull request to the development branch?

@drewbanin
Copy link
Contributor

Yeah! Not your fault though - I should have caught it. master always contains the code from our last production release, and development contains all the code between releases. Not a huge deal, just wanted to do some housekeeping :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants