Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix usage and quoting to fix hub #336

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 16, 2021
Merged

fix usage and quoting to fix hub #336

merged 2 commits into from
Apr 16, 2021

Conversation

coapacetic
Copy link
Contributor

This is a:

  • bug fix PR with no breaking changes — please ensure the base branch is master
  • new functionality — please ensure the base branch is the latest dev/ branch
  • a breaking change — please ensure the base branch is the latest dev/ branch

Description & motivation

hub.getdbt.com isn't looking so great. I think the culprit is the use of a > for quoting in markdown. I'm submitting this PR to hopefully then see this fixed over at hub.getdbt.com. While I was here, I also ensured that all usage headings were bolder for easier reading.

Here is an screenshot of hub.getdbt.com that isn't looking so hot right now.

image

Checklist

  • I have verified that these changes work locally on the following warehouses (Note: it's okay if you do not have access to all warehouses, this helps us understand what has been covered)
    • BigQuery
    • Postgres
    • Redshift
    • Snowflake
  • I have updated the README.md (if applicable)
  • I have added tests & descriptions to my models (and macros if applicable)
  • I have added an entry to CHANGELOG.md

Comment on lines 515 to 518
> This macro will soon be deprecated in favor of the more flexible `get_relations_by_pattern` macro (above)

Returns a list of [Relations](https://docs.getdbt.com/docs/writing-code-in-dbt/class-reference/#relation)
that match a given prefix, with an optional exclusion pattern. It's particularly
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this little bit of whitespace should do the trick 😄

@coapacetic
Copy link
Contributor Author

(closing out all things that might be open on my list) feel free to merge, not merge, close / whatever seems appropriate here 😄

@clrcrl clrcrl changed the base branch from master to dev/0.7.0 April 16, 2021 18:39
@clrcrl
Copy link
Contributor

clrcrl commented Apr 16, 2021

Changing the base to dev/0.7.0 to avoid making another 0.6.x release

Copy link
Contributor

@clrcrl clrcrl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks Coap!

@clrcrl clrcrl merged commit 049974c into dev/0.7.0 Apr 16, 2021
@clrcrl clrcrl deleted the fix/format-for-hub branch April 16, 2021 18:46
clrcrl pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 18, 2021
clrcrl pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 18, 2021
clrcrl pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 18, 2021
clrcrl pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 18, 2021
clrcrl pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 18, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants