Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add note about enterprise plans #5916

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Aug 28, 2024
Merged

Conversation

mirnawong1
Copy link
Contributor

add clarifying info that acct-level connections feature isn't yet available to enterprise plans (and free plans) yet. internal slack thread

@mirnawong1 mirnawong1 requested a review from a team as a code owner August 12, 2024 13:53
Copy link

vercel bot commented Aug 12, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Updated (UTC)
docs-getdbt-com ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview Aug 28, 2024 4:24pm

@github-actions github-actions bot added content Improvements or additions to content size: x-small This change will take under 3 hours to fix. Docs team Authored by the Docs team @dbt Labs labels Aug 12, 2024
@@ -33,9 +33,9 @@ Up until July 2024, connections were nested under projects. One dbt Cloud projec

<Lightbox src="/img/docs/dbt-cloud/cloud-configuring-dbt-cloud/connections-legacy-model.png" width="60%" title="Previous connection model"/>

We are rolling out an important change that moves connection management to the account level. The following connection management section describes these changes.
We are rolling out an important change that moves connection management to the account level. This feature is being rolled out in phases over the coming weeks. Please note that this change isn't yet available to Enterprise plans, but we anticipate it will be soon.
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@Fleid do we want to specifically say enterprise AND our free developer plans? or did you mean another free plan?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

also making sure this is in general and not specific to jus terraform users?

@mirnawong1
Copy link
Contributor Author

mirnawong1 commented Aug 12, 2024

if anyone from the docs team reviews, i wonder if the image in the callout is taking up a lot of space and overshadows the actual content? i would suggest removing the image and adding another sub header (h3 or h4 Comparing environments or Compare account-level and project-level environments (but that's so long)). cc @matthewshaver

Screenshot 2024-08-12 at 14 55 27

Copy link
Contributor

@nataliefiann nataliefiann left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hiya @mirnawong1

Thanks for raising this. Great PR and no suggestions or recommendations on my part. I'll approve this for you.

Kind Regards
Natalie

@mirnawong1
Copy link
Contributor Author

mirnawong1 commented Aug 28, 2024

Changing PR as this has been rolled out now

@mirnawong1 mirnawong1 deleted the add-global-connections-info branch August 28, 2024 08:45
@mirnawong1 mirnawong1 restored the add-global-connections-info branch August 28, 2024 09:08
@mirnawong1 mirnawong1 reopened this Aug 28, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added size: small This change will take 1 to 2 days to address and removed size: x-small This change will take under 3 hours to fix. labels Aug 28, 2024
@mirnawong1 mirnawong1 merged commit b3ad0e0 into current Aug 28, 2024
10 checks passed
@mirnawong1 mirnawong1 deleted the add-global-connections-info branch August 28, 2024 16:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
content Improvements or additions to content Docs team Authored by the Docs team @dbt Labs size: small This change will take 1 to 2 days to address
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants