Clarify requirements for relation widget #911
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Closed
|
Deploy preview ready! Built with commit ed361f1 |
|
Deploy preview ready! Built with commit ed361f1 |
|
Scratch that. It turns out it's not even possible to have a single-file collection not nested under |
|
@verythorough Yeah, it would be great if we can update the docs to explain that you have to nest files under a collection, been getting quite a few questions on that. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
- Summary
Addresses one of the concerns raised in #619: that it's not clear what types of collections are permitted with the
relationwidget.- Test plan
Check the deploy preview :)
- A picture of a cute animal (not mandatory but encouraged)
