Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

UpdateBy EM operators to allow fractional tick decay parameters #3745

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 28, 2023

Conversation

lbooker42
Copy link
Contributor

@lbooker42 lbooker42 commented Apr 26, 2023

This will modify the update_by operators ema, ems, em_min, em_max to allow floating point decay parameters and calculation.

Will close #2660, #3670

NOT READY FOR REVIEW, NEED TO MERGE #3731 AND REBASE.

@lbooker42 lbooker42 added this to the Apr 2023 milestone Apr 26, 2023
@lbooker42 lbooker42 self-assigned this Apr 26, 2023
Copy link
Contributor Author

@lbooker42 lbooker42 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Need to add some tests utilizing float tick parameters.

@lbooker42 lbooker42 merged commit 1eb5c32 into deephaven:main Apr 28, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 28, 2023
@deephaven-internal
Copy link
Contributor

@lbooker42 lbooker42 deleted the lab-ema-ticks branch June 26, 2024 20:00
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

The tick decay rate for EMA should not be constrained to be integer only.
4 participants