Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Barrage: Coalesce UncoalescedTables Prior to Subscribing/Fetching Data #5541

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
May 29, 2024

Conversation

nbauernfeind
Copy link
Member

Fixes #5538

@nbauernfeind nbauernfeind added this to the 3. May 2024 milestone May 28, 2024
@nbauernfeind nbauernfeind requested a review from rcaudy May 28, 2024 23:57
@nbauernfeind nbauernfeind self-assigned this May 28, 2024
Copy link
Member

@rcaudy rcaudy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I prefer unconditional .coalesce() on Table objects, rather than an instanceof UncoalescedTable check. That better matches the public API design. The assumption that the result is a BaseTable (really, a QueryTable) is also valid for all existing implementations.

@nbauernfeind nbauernfeind merged commit 5c08eb8 into deephaven:main May 29, 2024
15 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators May 29, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Automatically coalesce UncoalescedTable for DoExchange
2 participants