-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 80
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: Ensure that most TableListener/MergedListener Notifications are processed while ensuring liveness; improve timeout handling in Table.awaitUpdate #6422
Draft
rcaudy
wants to merge
6
commits into
deephaven:main
Choose a base branch
from
rcaudy:rwc-listenerliveness
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+207
−130
Draft
Changes from 5 commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
fb4f707
InstrumentedTableListenerBase and MergedListener Notifications will n…
rcaudy 1e32450
fix: BaseTable#awaitUpdate Could Account for Exclusive Lock Wait Time
nbauernfeind 88955c7
Slight modifications to Nate's improvement for BaseTable.awaitUpdate
rcaudy 40bcc8a
Fix TestTimeSeriesFilter to not accidentally preserve (absent GC) the…
rcaudy f28e9e2
Change where MergedListener validates and sets notificationStep, so w…
rcaudy 5ad117d
WIP on awaitUpdate improvements
rcaudy File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would check for timeoutMillis <= 0 and bail (or clamp it). I see no javadoc for the await call on Condition, but the standard wait call has the note:
In all respects, this method behaves as if wait(0L, 0) had been called. See the specification of the wait(long, int) method for details.
That has bit some of the Enterprise gRPC timeout handling in the past.
Which points out that if you have a zero argument, you are going to wait forever. I would prefer to have a check within the try to be very explicit about that edge case.