Replies: 2 comments
-
You may consider increase the prefactor of the energy loss, i.e. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
By the way, you need to ensure the DFT accuracy is enough before doing
everything else.
…On Fri, Feb 9, 2024 at 2:41 PM Jinzhe Zeng ***@***.***> wrote:
You may consider increase the prefactor of the energy loss, i.e.
loss/start_pref_e and loss/limit_pref_e. The current value is quite small.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#3251 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACIOQ7WUH6M47D366JNYQ33YSZ3VLAVCNFSM6AAAAABDA3UHROVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43SRDJONRXK43TNFXW4Q3PNVWWK3TUHM4DIMRSGY3TA>
.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message
ID: ***@***.***
.com>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
I have done some trainings on a small molecule and the obtained results is shown in the attached figure.
The input.json is also attatched.
As can be seen, the energy is much worse than force. I have tried to increase the start_pref_e and limit_pref_e as suggested in some discussions. However, both energy and force become worse than using the parameters given in the examples.
I wonder whether there is any other suggestions to improve the results.
Thanks!
input.json
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions