Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(pt): add datafile option for change-bias #3945

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 3, 2024

Conversation

iProzd
Copy link
Collaborator

@iProzd iProzd commented Jul 3, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Added optional --datafile argument to specify a file for system data processing.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved help messages for --datafile argument to clarify its usage.
  • Tests

    • Enhanced test coverage for changing bias with a new method that handles data from a system file.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 3, 2024

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes primarily enhance the functionality related to handling data files in the deepmd project. They update help messages for command-line arguments, add new arguments to specify data files, and handle new logic for processing data from these files. Additionally, the update includes modifications to the testing framework, incorporating tests that involve temporary files and bias change using these files.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
deepmd/main.py Updated help messages for the --datafile argument and added a new --datafile argument in the parser_change_bias_source section.
deepmd/pt/entrypoints/main.py Introduced a conditional block to read system data from a file if FLAGS.datafile is not None; otherwise, it processes data from FLAGS.system.
source/tests/pt/test_change_bias.py Added imports (tempfile and run_dp from common.py), declared self.model_path_data_file_bias, added a new test_change_bias_with_data_sys_file method, and updated existing test methods to use run_dp.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
  actor User
  participant CLI as Command Line Interface
  participant Main as deepmd/main.py
  participant Entrypoint as deepmd/pt/entrypoints/main.py
  participant System as System Data Processor
  
  User->>CLI: Execute with --datafile argument
  CLI->>Main: Parse arguments
  Main->>Entrypoint: Pass FLAGS with datafile
  alt FLAGS.datafile is not None
    Entrypoint->>System: Read system data from file
  else FLAGS.datafile is None
    Entrypoint->>System: Process data from FLAGS.system
  end
  System-->>Entrypoint: Retrieve processed data
  Entrypoint-->>Main: Pass processed data
  Main-->>User: Output results
Loading

Tip

AI model upgrade

gpt-4o model for reviews and chat is now live

OpenAI claims that this model is better at understanding and generating code than the previous models. Please join our Discord Community to provide any feedback or to report any issues.


Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between f2223fb and 3eb91c4.

Files selected for processing (3)
  • deepmd/main.py (2 hunks)
  • deepmd/pt/entrypoints/main.py (1 hunks)
  • source/tests/pt/test_change_bias.py (4 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (3)
source/tests/pt/test_change_bias.py (2)

40-42: Importing run_dp from common

The run_dp function is imported from common.py, which is used in the test methods.

This import is necessary for the test functions.


84-86: New attribute self.model_path_data_file_bias

The new attribute self.model_path_data_file_bias follows the pattern of other model paths and is correctly initialized.

This addition is necessary for the new test method.

deepmd/main.py (1)

686-692: New argument --datafile

The new argument --datafile is correctly added to the parser_change_bias_source and follows the pattern of other arguments.

This addition is necessary for handling data from a system file.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@iProzd iProzd requested review from njzjz and wanghan-iapcm July 3, 2024 02:15
@github-actions github-actions bot added the Python label Jul 3, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 3, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 82.85%. Comparing base (f2223fb) to head (3eb91c4).
Report is 108 commits behind head on devel.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##            devel    #3945      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   82.85%   82.85%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         520      520              
  Lines       50805    50810       +5     
  Branches     3015     3015              
==========================================
+ Hits        42096    42097       +1     
- Misses       7774     7775       +1     
- Partials      935      938       +3     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

deepmd/main.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@iProzd iProzd requested a review from wanghan-iapcm July 3, 2024 03:03
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

source/tests/pt/test_change_bias.py Show resolved Hide resolved
source/tests/pt/test_change_bias.py Show resolved Hide resolved
deepmd/pt/entrypoints/main.py Show resolved Hide resolved
@iProzd iProzd added this pull request to the merge queue Jul 3, 2024
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Jul 3, 2024
@iProzd iProzd added this pull request to the merge queue Jul 3, 2024
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Jul 3, 2024
@iProzd iProzd added this pull request to the merge queue Jul 3, 2024
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Jul 3, 2024
@iProzd iProzd added this pull request to the merge queue Jul 3, 2024
Merged via the queue into deepmodeling:devel with commit 29db791 Jul 3, 2024
61 checks passed
@iProzd iProzd deleted the add_f_change_bias branch July 3, 2024 15:44
mtaillefumier pushed a commit to mtaillefumier/deepmd-kit that referenced this pull request Sep 18, 2024
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->

## Summary by CodeRabbit

- **New Features**
- Added optional `--datafile` argument to specify a file for system data
processing.

- **Bug Fixes**
- Improved `help` messages for `--datafile` argument to clarify its
usage.

- **Tests**
- Enhanced test coverage for changing bias with a new method that
handles data from a system file.

<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants