-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 520
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix: tf dipole atomic key #3975
Conversation
WalkthroughWalkthroughThe recent change in the Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## devel #3975 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 82.82% 82.83%
=======================================
Files 522 522
Lines 50867 50867
Branches 3015 3020 +5
=======================================
+ Hits 42133 42135 +2
Misses 7794 7794
+ Partials 940 938 -2 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I retry the steps in #3970 and it works.
I believe this should fix deepmodeling#3970 <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **Bug Fixes** - Updated label naming convention from "atomic_" to "atom_" to ensure consistency in labeling. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
I believe this should fix #3970
Summary by CodeRabbit