-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 519
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(jax/array-api): energy fitting #4204
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Jinzhe Zeng <jinzhe.zeng@rutgers.edu>
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request introduces several modifications across multiple files to enhance compatibility with array APIs. Key changes include the integration of Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant GeneralFitting
participant AtomExcludeMask
participant EnergyFittingNet
User->>GeneralFitting: call serialize()
GeneralFitting->>GeneralFitting: use to_numpy_array()
GeneralFitting->>User: return serialized data
User->>GeneralFitting: call _call_common(inputs)
GeneralFitting->>GeneralFitting: handle inputs with array_api_compat
GeneralFitting->>User: return processed output
User->>EnergyFittingNet: create instance
EnergyFittingNet->>EnergyFittingNet: call __setattr__()
EnergyFittingNet->>User: return instance
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 10
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
source/tests/array_api_strict/utils/exclude_mask.py (2)
14-19
: LGTM:AtomExcludeMask
class implementation is correct.The
AtomExcludeMask
class correctly inherits fromAtomExcludeMaskDP
and overrides the__setattr__
method to handle thetype_mask
attribute. The implementation ensures that thetype_mask
is converted to the correct array format usingto_array_api_strict_array
.Consider using a set for slightly improved readability:
- if name in {"type_mask"}: + if name in {"type_mask"}:This change doesn't affect functionality but might be slightly more idiomatic for a single-element check.
Line range hint
20-24
: LGTM:PairExcludeMask
class implementation is correct. Consider reducing code duplication.The
PairExcludeMask
class correctly inherits fromPairExcludeMaskDP
and overrides the__setattr__
method to handle thetype_mask
attribute. The implementation is consistent with theAtomExcludeMask
class, which is good for maintainability.To reduce code duplication, consider extracting the common
__setattr__
logic into a mixin class or a utility function. This would make the code more DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself) and easier to maintain. Here's an example of how you could refactor this:class TypeMaskMixin: def __setattr__(self, name: str, value: Any) -> None: if name in {"type_mask"}: value = to_array_api_strict_array(value) return super().__setattr__(name, value) class AtomExcludeMask(TypeMaskMixin, AtomExcludeMaskDP): pass class PairExcludeMask(TypeMaskMixin, PairExcludeMaskDP): passThis refactoring would centralize the
__setattr__
logic and make it easier to update or extend in the future.source/tests/array_api_strict/fitting/fitting.py (1)
19-32
: LGTM with suggestions: Utility function for attribute handling.The
setattr_for_general_fitting
function provides a centralized point for attribute handling, which is good for maintainability. However, consider the following suggestions:
- Add error handling for the NetworkCollection deserialization to gracefully handle potential issues.
- Consider using a more flexible approach for the 'emask' attribute to reduce tight coupling with the AtomExcludeMask class.
Here's a suggested improvement for error handling:
elif name == "nets": try: value = NetworkCollection.deserialize(value.serialize()) except Exception as e: raise ValueError(f"Failed to deserialize NetworkCollection: {str(e)}")
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (9)
- deepmd/dpmodel/fitting/general_fitting.py (7 hunks)
- deepmd/dpmodel/utils/exclude_mask.py (2 hunks)
- deepmd/jax/fitting/init.py (1 hunks)
- deepmd/jax/fitting/fitting.py (1 hunks)
- deepmd/jax/utils/exclude_mask.py (1 hunks)
- source/tests/array_api_strict/fitting/init.py (1 hunks)
- source/tests/array_api_strict/fitting/fitting.py (1 hunks)
- source/tests/array_api_strict/utils/exclude_mask.py (1 hunks)
- source/tests/consistent/fitting/test_ener.py (4 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- deepmd/jax/fitting/init.py
- source/tests/array_api_strict/fitting/init.py
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (17)
source/tests/array_api_strict/utils/exclude_mask.py (1)
6-7
: LGTM: Import statements are correct and necessary.The import statements for
AtomExcludeMaskDP
andPairExcludeMaskDP
are correctly added and are essential for the new classes defined in this file.deepmd/jax/utils/exclude_mask.py (4)
6-9
: LGTM: Import statements are appropriate.The new import statements are correctly added to support the implementation of the
AtomExcludeMask
andPairExcludeMask
classes. The imports fromdeepmd.jax.common
provide necessary functionality for Flax integration and JAX array conversion.
14-20
: LGTM: AtomExcludeMask class implementation is correct and consistent.The
AtomExcludeMask
class is well-implemented:
- It correctly uses the
@flax_module
decorator for Flax integration.- It inherits from
AtomExcludeMaskDP
, extending its functionality.- The
__setattr__
method ensures that thetype_mask
attribute is always stored as a JAX array, which is consistent with JAX-based implementations.- The implementation is similar to the existing
PairExcludeMask
class, maintaining consistency in the codebase.
Line range hint
23-27
: Consistency between AtomExcludeMask and PairExcludeMask is maintained.The implementation of
PairExcludeMask
remains unchanged and is consistent with the newly addedAtomExcludeMask
class. This consistency in design and implementation across similar classes is a good practice and enhances code maintainability.
Line range hint
1-27
: Summary: Changes align well with PR objectives and maintain code quality.The modifications in this file contribute to the PR's objective of enhancing compatibility with array APIs:
- The new
AtomExcludeMask
class and the existingPairExcludeMask
class both use the@flax_module
decorator and converttype_mask
to JAX arrays.- These changes are consistent with the integration of
array_api_compat
mentioned in the PR objectives.- The implementation maintains good code quality through consistency between classes and proper use of inheritance.
The SPDX license identifier is correctly included at the top of the file.
source/tests/array_api_strict/fitting/fitting.py (3)
1-16
: LGTM: Imports and license are correctly specified.The SPDX license identifier is present, and the imports are appropriate for the functionality being implemented. Good practice in renaming the imported EnergyFittingNet to avoid naming conflicts.
35-38
: LGTM: Well-implemented class extension.The
EnergyFittingNet
class effectively extendsEnergyFittingNetDP
with custom attribute setting. The implementation is concise and makes good use of the utility functionsetattr_for_general_fitting
. The use ofsuper()
in__setattr__
ensures proper inheritance behavior.
1-38
: Overall: Well-implemented functionality with minor suggestions for improvement.This new file introduces functionality for handling general fitting attributes in energy fitting networks. The implementation is well-structured, with a utility function for centralized attribute handling and a class that extends existing functionality.
Key points:
- Good use of type hints and imports.
- The utility function
setattr_for_general_fitting
provides a centralized point for attribute handling.- The
EnergyFittingNet
class effectively extendsEnergyFittingNetDP
with custom attribute setting.Consider implementing the suggested improvements for error handling in the NetworkCollection deserialization and exploring ways to reduce coupling with the AtomExcludeMask class.
deepmd/jax/fitting/fitting.py (3)
1-17
: Imports are correctly structured and completeThe import statements successfully include all necessary modules and classes required for the functionality of the file. They are organized following standard Python conventions.
19-33
:setattr_for_general_fitting
function is well-implementedThe function
setattr_for_general_fitting
correctly handles attribute assignment based on the attribute name. It applies the necessary transformations tovalue
for specific attribute names, ensuring that attributes are correctly processed before assignment.
35-39
:EnergyFittingNet
class override of__setattr__
is appropriateThe
EnergyFittingNet
class appropriately overrides the__setattr__
method to utilizesetattr_for_general_fitting
, ensuring that any attributes set are processed according to the defined logic before being assigned. This maintains consistency and control over attribute assignments.deepmd/dpmodel/utils/exclude_mask.py (1)
21-26
: Improved Variable Assignment Enhances ClarityUsing a local variable
type_mask
before assigning it toself.type_mask
improves code readability and maintainability. It allows for intermediate operations without directly modifying the instance attribute.source/tests/consistent/fitting/test_ener.py (5)
15-16
: LGTM!Importing
INSTALLED_ARRAY_API_STRICT
andINSTALLED_JAX
to handle conditional imports is appropriate.
41-47
: Conditional import of JAX componentsThe conditional import of JAX modules and setting
EnerFittingJAX
toobject
when JAX is not installed is properly handled. Ensure that any usage ofEnerFittingJAX
in the tests accounts for this scenario to prevent runtime errors.
48-55
: Conditional import of Array API Strict componentsSimilarly, the conditional import of
array_api_strict
and settingEnerFittingStrict
toNone
when not installed is correctly implemented. Make sure to handle cases whereEnerFittingStrict
isNone
to avoid attribute errors during testing.
97-107
: LGTM!The
skip_array_api_strict
property correctly handles cases wherearray_api_strict
is not installed or when the precision is"bfloat16"
, which is unsupported.
112-113
: LGTM!Assigning
jax_class
andarray_api_strict_class
to the appropriate classes ensures that the tests utilize the correct backend implementations.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
AtomExcludeMask
class for improved attribute handling in exclusion masks.Improvements
Documentation