Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Chore: refactor get standard model #4205

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Oct 14, 2024

Conversation

anyangml
Copy link
Collaborator

@anyangml anyangml commented Oct 11, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Simplified model component creation by introducing a new function for better code clarity and reusability.
    • Updated model-building functions to utilize the new component creation logic, enhancing maintainability.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 11, 2024

📝 Walkthrough
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request introduce a new private function _get_standard_model_components in the deepmd/pt/model/model/__init__.py file. This function centralizes the logic for creating model components, specifically for the descriptor and fitting network, based on provided model parameters. It replaces inline code in the get_linear_model, get_zbl_model, and get_standard_model functions, improving code structure and reusability. Additionally, the logic for determining the model class based on the fitting network type has been updated to streamline the process.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
deepmd/pt/model/model/init.py Added private method _get_standard_model_components for creating model components; refactored get_linear_model, get_zbl_model, and get_standard_model to utilize this new method. Updated logic for model class determination using fitting_net_type.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant ModelBuilder
    participant Descriptor
    participant FittingNetwork

    User->>ModelBuilder: Request model creation
    ModelBuilder->>_get_standard_model_components: Call with model_params
    _get_standard_model_components->>Descriptor: Create descriptor
    _get_standard_model_components->>FittingNetwork: Create fitting network
    _get_standard_model_components-->>ModelBuilder: Return components
    ModelBuilder-->>User: Return model
Loading

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 94a25ea and b79cdea.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • deepmd/pt/model/model/init.py (4 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • deepmd/pt/model/model/init.py

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8174cf1 and 94a25ea.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • deepmd/pt/model/model/init.py (4 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (2)
deepmd/pt/model/model/__init__.py (2)

75-96: Well-structured function for standard model components

The introduction of the _get_standard_model_components function effectively encapsulates the logic for creating the descriptor and fitting network components, enhancing code reuse and maintainability.


143-145: Consistent use of _get_standard_model_components

Refactoring to utilize _get_standard_model_components across different model creation functions reduces code duplication and improves clarity.

Also applies to: 177-177, 238-238

deepmd/pt/model/model/__init__.py Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 11, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 92.85714% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 83.48%. Comparing base (8174cf1) to head (b79cdea).
Report is 3 commits behind head on devel.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
deepmd/pt/model/model/__init__.py 92.85% 2 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##            devel    #4205      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   83.45%   83.48%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         540      540              
  Lines       52455    52428      -27     
  Branches     3047     3047              
==========================================
- Hits        43778    43769       -9     
+ Misses       7730     7712      -18     
  Partials      947      947              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@wanghan-iapcm wanghan-iapcm requested a review from iProzd October 14, 2024 00:29
@iProzd iProzd added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 14, 2024
Merged via the queue into deepmodeling:devel with commit a1f8672 Oct 14, 2024
60 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants