Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: zbl rcut, sel #4335

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 11, 2024
Merged

Conversation

anyangml
Copy link
Collaborator

@anyangml anyangml commented Nov 11, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Improved parameter handling in the get_zbl_model function for better encapsulation.
    • No changes to existing functionality or public interfaces.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 11, 2024

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request focus on the get_zbl_model function within the deepmd/pt/model/model/__init__.py file. The parameters rcut and sel for the PairTabAtomicModel constructor are now obtained through methods from the descriptor object, enhancing encapsulation. Other functions, including _can_be_converted_to_float, _convert_preset_out_bias_to_array, and get_standard_model, remain unchanged in their structure and functionality. Overall, the modifications improve parameter handling without altering the existing control flow or introducing new functionalities.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
deepmd/pt/model/model/init.py Updated get_zbl_model to derive rcut and sel from descriptor methods instead of the dictionary. Functions _can_be_converted_to_float, _convert_preset_out_bias_to_array, and get_standard_model remain unchanged.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant Descriptor
    participant PairTabAtomicModel

    User->>Descriptor: Request rcut and sel
    Descriptor->>Descriptor: get_rcut()
    Descriptor->>Descriptor: get_sel()
    Descriptor-->>User: Return rcut, sel
    User->>PairTabAtomicModel: Create with rcut, sel
Loading

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between dcbf607 and 050edd4.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • deepmd/pt/model/model/__init__.py (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
deepmd/pt/model/model/__init__.py (1)

183-184: LGTM! Improved encapsulation by using descriptor methods.

The change to use descriptor.get_rcut() and descriptor.get_sel() instead of directly accessing the descriptor parameters improves encapsulation and maintainability.

Let's verify that these methods return the same values as before:

✅ Verification successful

Let me gather more information to verify the descriptor methods implementation.


Let me check the base descriptor implementation since we found the relevant files.


Let me check the actual descriptor implementation that inherits from DescriptorBlock since we can see the abstract methods are defined but need to verify the concrete implementation.


Let me check one of the concrete implementations to verify how these methods are implemented.


Based on the code analysis, I can now generate the final response:

✓ Verified: Descriptor methods correctly provide rcut and sel values

The change to use descriptor.get_rcut() and descriptor.get_sel() is safe and maintains consistent behavior because:

  • The descriptor class properly implements these methods as required by the DescriptorBlock base class
  • get_rcut() returns the same rcut value that was passed to the descriptor constructor
  • get_sel() returns the same sel list that was passed to the descriptor constructor
  • These methods are part of the public API defined in the abstract base class and implemented by all descriptor types
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the descriptor methods return consistent values
# Search for any direct access to rcut and sel in descriptor parameters
rg -A 2 'descriptor\["(rcut|sel)"\]'

# Search for the implementation of get_rcut and get_sel methods
ast-grep --pattern 'def get_(rcut|sel)' -A 5

Length of output: 489


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for descriptor class definitions and their methods
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ {
  $$$
  get_rcut($$$) {
    $$$
  }
  $$$
}'

ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ {
  $$$
  get_sel($$$) {
    $$$
  }
  $$$
}'

# Search for any descriptor-related files
fd descriptor

Length of output: 1913


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the base descriptor implementation in PyTorch
cat deepmd/pt/model/descriptor/base_descriptor.py

# Also check the descriptor implementation
cat deepmd/pt/model/descriptor/descriptor.py

Length of output: 8263


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for classes that inherit from DescriptorBlock
rg -l "class.*\(.*DescriptorBlock.*\)" 

# Let's also check the dpmodel descriptor since it might be the base implementation
cat deepmd/dpmodel/descriptor/descriptor.py

Length of output: 6150


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the SE_T implementation as an example
cat deepmd/pt/model/descriptor/se_t.py

# Also check the original implementation that's being modified
cat deepmd/pt/model/model/__init__.py

Length of output: 40677


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@anyangml anyangml requested a review from njzjz November 11, 2024 04:27
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 11, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 84.51%. Comparing base (dcbf607) to head (050edd4).
Report is 2 commits behind head on devel.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##            devel    #4335   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   84.51%   84.51%           
=======================================
  Files         575      575           
  Lines       53398    53398           
  Branches     3059     3059           
=======================================
  Hits        45129    45129           
  Misses       7306     7306           
  Partials      963      963           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Member

@njzjz njzjz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@anyangml anyangml enabled auto-merge November 11, 2024 05:02
@anyangml anyangml added this pull request to the merge queue Nov 11, 2024
Merged via the queue into deepmodeling:devel with commit e73e60c Nov 11, 2024
60 checks passed
@anyangml anyangml deleted the fix/update-zbl-input-parse branch November 11, 2024 07:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants