Fix: add model_def_script to ZBL

[anyangml]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features

  • Enhanced model definition handling for improved encapsulation and consistency across different model types.

• Bug Fixes

  • Ensured that model definition scripts are correctly set to a JSON string representation for all model instances.

[coderabbitai]

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve modifications to the get_zbl_model and get_standard_model functions in the deepmd/pt/model/model/__init__.py file. The get_zbl_model function now assigns the model instance to a variable before setting its model_def_script attribute to a JSON string representation of model_params. Similarly, the get_standard_model function has been updated to set the model_def_script attribute in a consistent manner. No changes were made to the signatures of exported or public entities.

Changes

File Path	Change Summary
deepmd/pt/model/model/init.py	Modified get_zbl_model to assign the model to a variable and set model_def_script to JSON. Updated get_standard_model to set model_def_script similarly.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Caller
    participant ModelFactory
    participant DPZBLModel

    Caller->>ModelFactory: get_zbl_model()
    ModelFactory->>DPZBLModel: Create instance
    ModelFactory->>ModelFactory: model = instance
    ModelFactory->>ModelFactory: model.model_def_script = JSON(model_params)
    ModelFactory->>Caller: return model

Loading

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e695a91 and 977447b.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• deepmd/pt/model/model/__init__.py (2 hunks)

🔇 Additional comments (2)

deepmd/pt/model/model/__init__.py (2)

Line range hint 199-209: LGTM: Consistent implementation of model_def_script.

The addition of model_def_script to the ZBL model follows the same pattern as other model types, ensuring consistent behavior across the codebase.

---

Line range hint 282-282: Verify consistent usage of model_def_script across all model types.

Let's verify that all model types properly set the model_def_script attribute.

✅ Verification successful

Let me gather more information to specifically check for model_def_script assignments.

---

Model definition script is consistently set across model types

The verification shows that model_def_script is properly handled:

• Base implementation in model.py initializes model_def_script and provides getter method
• Both get_standard_model and get_zbl_model set model_def_script during initialization
• Proper inheritance in specialized models like SpinModel and FrozenModel that override get_model_def_script()
• FrozenModel correctly uses model_def_script for serialization/deserialization

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if model_def_script is consistently set across all model types

# Search for model instantiations and model_def_script assignments
ast-grep --pattern 'model = $CLASS($$$)
$$$
model.model_def_script = $$$'

# Search for potential missing model_def_script assignments
ast-grep --pattern 'model = $CLASS($$$)' | grep -v 'model_def_script'

Length of output: 11751

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for model_def_script assignments in model initialization files
rg -A 2 "model_def_script" deepmd/pt/model/model/

# Search for model initialization functions that might need model_def_script
ast-grep --pattern 'def get_$_model($$$):
  $$$
  model = $$$'

Length of output: 2137

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 84.64%. Comparing base (e7925f3) to head (977447b).
Report is 20 commits behind head on devel.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##            devel    #4423      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   84.59%   84.64%   +0.05%     
==========================================
  Files         614      614              
  Lines       57009    57137     +128     
  Branches     3488     3486       -2     
==========================================
+ Hits        48224    48366     +142     
+ Misses       7658     7645      -13     
+ Partials     1127     1126       -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[njzjz]

@iProzd is it possible to add some tests in the universal directory?

[njzjz]

@iProzd is it possible to add some tests in the universal directory?

When I look at this file, I am wondering if other models (e.g. spin) have the same issue.

[anyangml]

@iProzd is it possible to add some tests in the universal directory?

When I look at this file, I am wondering if other models (e.g. spin) have the same issue.

likely

[anyangml]

Pairtab model does not support compression. @njzjz

[njzjz]

Pairtab model does not support compression. @njzjz

This seems to be a different topic. My insight is that an empty method is enough.