feat: much faster file name resolution using ListFiles #75
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
problem description
api.get_dataframe
(and thereforeDataFrame.from_deeporigin
) can take extremely long because:list_database_rows
anddescribe_row
take place in series when they could take place in parallel (this is a problem of 700ms vs 300ms)DescriebFile
calls are made in series, where N is the number of files in the database. this means that the time it takes to fetch data grows with the number of files linearly, and the time for each file resolution is ~350ms.proposed solution in this PR
using a new
ListFiles
endpoint that allows us to resolve all file IDs and names in a single API call (which typically takes 300ms no matter how many files)screenshot
from cold start, this is how long it takes to display a dataframe. in the old version, this took ~10s
rejected alternative
using async methods. this approach was tried in this PR: #73
it was rejected because it's much slower, and complicates testing dramatically