-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 400
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(python): add support for pyarrow 13+ #1804
Merged
Merged
Changes from 11 commits
Commits
Show all changes
13 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
7ac917a
some fixes for pyarrow 13
wjones127 27bb16d
try and optimize spark table
wjones127 e3e7c31
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/main' into fix/pyarrow-13
rtyler a2e11e9
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/main' into fix/pyarrow-13
rtyler cd2beaf
cargo fmt
rtyler 205bf13
fix: allow pyarrow 13
wjones127 e70770b
cleanup
wjones127 4d4de1f
write with non compliant types
ion-elgreco 0838263
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin' into fix/pyarrow_13_upgrade
ion-elgreco c5d44ee
formatting
ion-elgreco 69dfbed
use module directly
ion-elgreco 702027e
remove equal_batch logic
ion-elgreco 0668c99
remove line
ion-elgreco File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@ion-elgreco If we take this out, do the tests still pass?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, everything passes still.
Shall I take it out?Or would we require it later once we enable the compliant types again.
edit: Taking it out for now.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ideally I think we shouldn’t need it. This was an earlier attempt at fixing the compliant types thing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We should have backwards compatibility during reads and writes when we use the compliant types, I think spark-delta also doesn't write these compliant types but I may be wrong here