Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactor repetitive parts of JamfProtect Collector #37252

Open
wants to merge 50 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

rshunim
Copy link
Contributor

@rshunim rshunim commented Nov 17, 2024

Status

  • In Progress
  • Ready
  • In Hold - (Reason for hold)

Related Issues

fixes: https://jira-dc.paloaltonetworks.com/browse/CIAC-12143

Description

A few sentences describing the overall goals of the pull request's commits.

Must have

  • Tests
  • Documentation

@rshunim rshunim self-assigned this Nov 17, 2024
@rshunim rshunim marked this pull request as ready for review November 17, 2024 14:05
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 17, 2024

Coverage

Coverage Report
FileStmtsMissCoverMissing
Packs/JamfProtect/Integrations/JamfProtectEventCollector
   JamfProtectEventCollector.py1893283%69–74, 86–88, 101–110, 123–124, 137, 141, 233, 332, 380, 397–398, 611, 632–633, 723
TOTAL1893283% 

Tests Skipped Failures Errors Time
112 0 💤 0 ❌ 0 🔥 13.194s ⏱️

@rshunim
Copy link
Contributor Author

rshunim commented Dec 1, 2024

@yedidyacohenpalo please have a look in addition to @dorschw

@rshunim rshunim requested a review from dorschw December 1, 2024 14:45
rshunim and others added 10 commits December 2, 2024 10:39
…rotectEventCollector.py

Co-authored-by: dorschw <81086590+dorschw@users.noreply.github.com>
…rotectEventCollector.py

Co-authored-by: dorschw <81086590+dorschw@users.noreply.github.com>
…rotectEventCollector.py

Co-authored-by: dorschw <81086590+dorschw@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants