fix(testing): add missing methods to test alias of it

[IgorM867]

test is documented as an alias for it, but it does not currently implement methods like only, ignore, and skip. This PR fixes the issue by ensuring test correctly mirrors the behavior and methods of it.

Fixes #6220

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 80.00000% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 96.52%. Comparing base (c88c773) to head (6a0eb25).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
testing/bdd.ts	80.00%	3 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #6222      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   96.53%   96.52%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         534      534              
  Lines       40952    40967      +15     
  Branches     6133     6133              
==========================================
+ Hits        39535    39542       +7     
- Misses       1375     1382       +7     
- Partials       42       43       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[kt3k]

Mostly looks good to me. Thanks for working on this. Left a few questions.

[kt3k]

Can we use it.only?

Suggested change

	const options = itDefinition(...args);
	return it({
	...options,
	only: true,
	});
	it.only(...args);

[kt3k]

Can we use it.ignore?

Suggested change

	const options = itDefinition(...args);
	return it({
	...options,
	ignore: true,
	});
	it.ignore(...args);

[IgorM867]

You’re right. I made the requested changes, and I also added some tests. However, I’m not completely confident about these tests because I copied an existing it test, which led to a lot of duplicate code. Let me know what you think.

[kt3k]

I don't think we need new test cases for these as they only have single line implementations, and no new logics are introduced.

[kt3k]

LGTM