Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Integrate VA Stakeholders Feedback into Q3 Survey Results #19441

Closed
1 task done
Tracked by #13312 ...
gracekretschmer-metrostar opened this issue Oct 8, 2024 · 5 comments
Closed
1 task done
Tracked by #13312 ...
Assignees
Labels
CMS Team CMS Product team that manages both editor exp and devops

Comments

@gracekretschmer-metrostar
Copy link

gracekretschmer-metrostar commented Oct 8, 2024

User Story or Problem Statement

As an OCTO stakeholder, I need to know how my feedback will be integrated back into the Q3 Survey Results doc.

Relevant Work

Steps for Implementation

  • Send report to VA stakeholders to review. Give VA stakeholders with expectations on how and when to give feedback.
  • Integrate VA stakeholders feedback into the report.
  • Synthesize and finalize report.

Acceptance Criteria

  • A finalized report that is ready to be sent to VA-at-large for Q3 editor survey results that includes VA stakeholders' feedback.
@aklausmeier
Copy link

aklausmeier commented Oct 15, 2024

Add recommended next steps to include areas we should research more of or consider design iterations on. Include in the internal report, NOT the stakeholder report.

@mmiddaugh
Copy link
Contributor

mmiddaugh commented Oct 15, 2024

Thanks for the opportunity to review your draft, @MDomngz

Appreciate the detailed and clear presentation of the responses, expressed in both percentage and number and the notable quotes

Suggest the following

  • a Key findings section with clear bullet points preceding the data (i.e., The majority of respondents are relatively new to the system) - this will help readers scan/extract summary
  • Recommendations for future iterations of the survey itself - what went well + what, if anything you'd do differently, such as new questions to consider next time, changes to the way existing questions are asked, or the inclusion of definitions for "accessible content" or "plain language"
  • Recommendations to address actionable findings + any areas for further segmentation/analysis or addition research

@RLHecht
Copy link
Collaborator

RLHecht commented Oct 15, 2024

@MDomngz this is really great to read. Thanks for sharing this with me. One thought I have (and maybe it's more for a future survey), is if it's worth looking at survey results based on the product worked on. For example, which types of editors find Drupal easy to learn or find what they need in the knowledge base. Seeing that might be helpful when figuring out next steps to improve certain areas.

@MDomngz
Copy link
Collaborator

MDomngz commented Oct 21, 2024

After an internal team discussion -

  • synthesize survey results into top insights/findings with recommendations/next steps section
  • For "unpack" flags - synthesize and consolidate findings

@EWashb
Copy link
Contributor

EWashb commented Oct 23, 2024

I think this work is great @MDomngz @gracekretschmer-metrostar. I have no notes. I understand there were other insights about digging deeper into individual products but I do not think it is in scope of this first survey. We can add them as things to consider on the next round.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CMS Team CMS Product team that manages both editor exp and devops
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants