-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Properly handle input options #1793
Properly handle input options #1793
Conversation
kick-the-bucket
commented
Jan 15, 2019
Q | A |
---|---|
Bug fix? | Yes |
New feature? | No |
BC breaks? | No |
Deprecations? | No |
Fixed tickets | #1792 comment |
b4f76d9
to
c04f4a9
Compare
c04f4a9
to
30c8b21
Compare
Awesome! |
Looks like it's still handling the array options wrong in some edge cases, but I'll try to fix those as well. |
@kick-the-bucket so? How it's going? Maybe delete |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM!
minor changes required, not mandatory
@kick-the-bucket |
The option handling issues are logical, rather than type-related, so sadly this won't help. @rvitaliy I did find a way to pass
So it looks like the only thing that needs to be done for |
13d8719
to
933a1ef
Compare
933a1ef
to
8ce9f92
Compare
So, everything looks ok to me. @kick-the-bucket @rvitaliy merging? And please update changelog by |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
InputOption::VALUE_REQUIRED
accept empty string
but not null
Looks like all possible options values are now being handled correctly which was probably never the case since the feature was implemented almost 3 years ago 😅 |
LGTM 🍻 |