Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update telemetry enablement #104

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 7, 2022
Merged

Update telemetry enablement #104

merged 2 commits into from
Mar 7, 2022

Conversation

kim-tsao
Copy link
Contributor

@kim-tsao kim-tsao commented Feb 28, 2022

Signed-off-by: Kim Tsao ktsao@redhat.com

Please specify the area for this PR
Removes the hardcoded segment write key

What does does this PR do / why we need it:
We do not want to be collecting telemetry from users who set up their own devfile registries (per CNCF telemetry data policy). They should be sending telemetry to their own Segment instance

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #?
devfile/api#769

PR acceptance criteria:

  • Test (WIP)

  • Documentation (WIP)

How to test changes / Special notes to the reviewer:

@kim-tsao kim-tsao removed the request for review from elsony February 28, 2022 15:23
@kim-tsao kim-tsao marked this pull request as ready for review February 28, 2022 15:23
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested a review from elsony February 28, 2022 15:23
@kim-tsao kim-tsao removed the request for review from elsony March 1, 2022 14:09
Signed-off-by: Kim Tsao <ktsao@redhat.com>
Copy link
Member

@johnmcollier johnmcollier left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Generally looks good to me, can you also update the registry chart's readme to reference the new values.telemetry.key field?

registryName: "devfile-registry"
key: "6HBMiy5UxBtsbxXx7O4n0t0u4dt8IAR3"
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should this be unset instead?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes, let me update that

Signed-off-by: Kim Tsao <ktsao@redhat.com>
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 7, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 7, 2022

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: johnmcollier, kim-tsao

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Mar 7, 2022
@kim-tsao kim-tsao merged commit a663cf6 into devfile:main Mar 7, 2022
@kim-tsao kim-tsao deleted the telemetry branch May 3, 2022 15:39
@kim-tsao kim-tsao restored the telemetry branch October 25, 2022 20:07
@kim-tsao kim-tsao deleted the telemetry branch October 25, 2022 20:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
2 participants