Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
compiler: Yet another batch of compilation tweaks #2396
compiler: Yet another batch of compilation tweaks #2396
Changes from 14 commits
3f63463
875af51
887bbf0
4ab1f1c
b658103
dad8dc8
cba2ea9
60f5d43
1566fec
ad63a44
a5955a1
660a438
bd7c628
c988fa9
0851d5c
afe0719
efa27df
2d0f60a
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
These four lines are repeated twice. Worth constructing a utility function?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
which four lines? I only see two, starting at
if o.pragmas
-- which is too little to deserve a separate functionThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
but tbh, you're probably right
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
jusit import Interval above no?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would, but to make a neat distinction with our own Interval...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Note: aside from the "Case 3", the rest is just lifted from approximately 40 lines below
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why can middle/right subdimensions be ignored? Genuinely curious
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
we just don't treat them as we don't -- practically speaking need to
as per the docstring:
"A rudimentary test ..."
and
"Our implementation focuses on tiny yet relevant cases"
so basically this is a simplistic implementation, to be refined in the future if we ever will have to
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Explanatory comment of the 00, 01, etc would be helpful here
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
just dummy variable names because you have two "dimensions":
which leads to four objects