When mocking a class, why are non-virtual methods hidden in the generated proxy?

[diaconesq]

I have noticed a change between Moq 4.1.1 and 4.2.1.

In Moq 4.1.1, when creating a new Mock<ActualClass>(), the generated proxy type would not do anything special for non-virtual methods.

In Moq 4.2.1, the (public) non-virtual methods are hidden by new implementations (with the new keyword) in the generated proxy.

Why is that?
I still can't call .Setup(...) or .Verify(...) on non-virtual methods. (throws a 'NotSupported' exception, like it always did. ) It looks as if Moq is preparing things in order to be able to intercept those methods as well.

I'm asking because I think this violates the principle of least astonishment.
(I would have expected that calling the non-virtual method on the mock would call the actual implementation in the original class, regardless of specifying CallBase = true or not)

I have attached below a unit test that was broken by upgrading from Moq 4.1.1 to 4.2.1.

using System.Linq;
using Moq;
using NUnit.Framework;

public interface ILog
{
    void Log(string s);
    void LogFormat(string fmt, params object[] args);
}

public class MockableLog: ILog
{
    public void Log(string s)
    {
        WasLogged(s);
    }

    public void LogFormat(string fmt, params object[] args)
    {
        WasLogged(string.Format(fmt, args));
    }

    public virtual void WasLogged(string message)
    {
    }
}

public class UsesLog
{
    private readonly ILog log;

    public UsesLog(ILog log)
    {
        this.log = log;
    }

    public void LogSomething()
    {
        log.Log("test 1");

        //changing to this should not break the test:
        //log.LogFormat("test {0}", 1);
    }
}

[TestFixture]
public class UsesLogTest
{
    [Test]
    public void CheckLogWasCalledTwice()
    {
        //this used to work with Moq 4.1, not with 4.2
        //var fakeLog = new Mock<MockableLog>();

        //this works
        var fakeLog = new Mock<MockableLog>() { CallBase = true };
        var sut = new UsesLog(fakeLog.Object);


        var methods = fakeLog.Object.GetType().GetMethods()
            .Select(mi => new {mi.DeclaringType, mi.Name, mi.IsHideBySig})
            .OrderBy(mi => mi.Name).ThenBy(mi => mi.DeclaringType.Name)
            .ToList();
        sut.LogSomething();

        //fakeLog.Verify(log => log.Log(It.IsAny<string>()));

        //fakeLog.Verify(log => log.WasLogged(It.IsAny<string>()));
    }
}

[kzu]

Looks like an implementation detail that changed in the Castle.DynamicProxy
generator. You'll most likely see the same behavior in all the other
mocking libraries too.

On Sat, Oct 31, 2015, 6:28 AM Cristian Diaconescu notifications@github.com
wrote:

I have noticed a change between Moq 4.1.1 and 4.2.1.

In Moq 4.1.1, when creating a new Mock(), the generated
proxy type would not do anything special for non-virtual methods.

In Moq 4.2.1, the (public) non-virtual methods are hidden (with the new
keyword) by the generated proxy.

Why is that?
I still can't call .Setup(...) or .Verify(...) on non-virtual methods.
(throws a 'NotSupported' exception, like it always did. )

I'm asking because I think this violates the principle of least
astonishment.

I have attached below a unit test that was broken by upgrading from Moq
4.1.1 to 4.2.1.

using System.Linq;
using Moq;
using NUnit.Framework;

namespace TestMock
{
public interface ILog
{
void Log(string s);

void LogFormat(string fmt, params object[] args);

}

public class MockableLog: ILog
{
public void Log(string s)
{
WasLogged(s);
}

public void LogFormat(string fmt, params object[] args)
{
    WasLogged(string.Format(fmt, args));
}

public virtual void WasLogged(string message)
{
}

}

public class UsesLog
{
private readonly ILog log;

public UsesLog(ILog log)
{
    this.log = log;
}

public void LogSomething()
{
    log.Log("test 1");

    //changing to this should not break the test:
    //log.LogFormat("test {0}", 1);
}

}

[TestFixture]
public class UsesLogTest
{
[Test]
public void CheckLogWasCalledTwice()
{
//this used to work with Moq 4.1, not with 4.2
//var fakeLog = new Mock();

    //this works
    var fakeLog = new Mock<MockableLog>() { CallBase = true };
    var sut = new UsesLog(fakeLog.Object);


    var methods = fakeLog.Object.GetType().GetMethods()
        .Select(mi => new {mi.DeclaringType, mi.Name, mi.IsHideBySig})
        .OrderBy(mi => mi.Name).ThenBy(mi => mi.DeclaringType.Name)
        .ToList();
    sut.LogSomething();

    //fakeLog.Verify(log => log.Log(It.IsAny<string>()));

    //fakeLog.Verify(log => log.WasLogged(It.IsAny<string>()));
}

}

}

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#212.

[dougbu]

Still seeing this in Moq 4.5.12.

Due to the #129 fix, it is possible to Setup() non-virtual void implementations of interface members e.g. the following works

Mock<Stream> mock = new Mock<Stream>(MockBehavior.Strict);
mock.As<IDisposable>().Setup(s => s.Dispose());
mock.Protected().Setup("Dispose", true).Callback(() => innerStreamDisposed = true);

// Do something, perhaps w/ a wrapper, that calls `mock.Object.Dispose()`.

But approaches like the above don't work at all if the interface member returns a value. E.g. the System.Web.Http.ExceptionHandler class implements IExceptionHandler.HandleAsync() explicitly and pretty much can't be mocked w/ MockBehavior.Strict:

public abstract class ExceptionHandler : IExceptionHandler
{
    Task IExceptionHandler.HandleAsync(ExceptionHandlerContext context, CancellationToken cancellationToken)
    {
        // ...
        return HandleAsync(context, cancellationToken);
    }

    public virtual Task HandleAsync(ExceptionHandlerContext context, CancellationToken cancellationToken)
    {
        // ...
        return TaskHelpers.Completed();
    }
}

Mock<ExceptionHandler> mock = new Mock<ExceptionHandler>(MockBehavior.Strict);
mock
    .As<IExceptionHandler>()
    .Setup(h => h.HandleAsync(It.IsAny<ExceptionHandlerContext>(), It.IsAny<CancellationToken>()));

throws a MockException because the Setup() doesn't provide a value.

[dougbu]

Hit Comment too soon. Added another sentence or so.

[dougbu]

General question: Why is it correct for MockBehavior.Strict to block calls that cannot be setup?

[stakx]

@diaconesq: I couldn't get your test to work. It either always failed or always succeeded with pretty much any version of Moq. So I changed it to the following. I think it is equivalent to what you originally wanted to demonstrate:

public interface ILog
{
    void Log(string s);
}

public class MockableLog : ILog
{
    public void Log(string s) => WasLogged(s);
    public virtual void WasLogged(string message) { }
}

public class UsesLog
{
    private readonly ILog log;

    public UsesLog(ILog log)
    {
        this.log = log;
    }

    public void LogSomething() => log.Log("test 1");
}

[Fact]
public void Test()
{
    var mock = new Mock<MockableLog>();
    var sut = new UsesLog(mock.Object);
    sut.LogSomething();
    mock.Verify(log => log.WasLogged(It.IsAny<string>()));
}

This test breaks when upgrading from 4.2.1402.2112 (where it passes) to 4.2.1408.619 (where it fails). This has been fixed by #381, so you should be fine once you upgrade to Moq 4.7.63.

@dougbu: If you're still interested in an answer to your question above, could you please ask your question as a separate issue so we can track it independently of the originally reported issue? Thanks! :)