Add a .SetupThrowsDefault<T>() to configure a mock to throw w/o specifying a method

[sbrockway]

It would be useful if I could configure a mock to throw an exception when any member is accessed, without having to first declare a specific member via .Setup() in order to configure .Throws()

Similar to the feature Mock.SetupReturnsDefault() provides for specifying a return value without first specifying a member via .Setup()

For example:
mockDependency.SetupThrowsDefault<Exception>();
or
mockDependency.SetupThrowsDefault(new Exception());

If this sounds like a good idea, I'd be willing to fork and try it.

[kzu]

Wouldn't that be the same as creating a strict mock?

[sbrockway]

Yes. That does the trick. I forgot about Strict. Thanks @kzu !
Is it possible to change the mock's behavior after instantiation? I see the property is read-only.

[kzu]

Nope, you can't :(

On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 1:09 PM sbrockway notifications@github.com wrote:

Yes. That does the trick. I forgot about Strict. Thanks @kzu
https://github.com/kzu !
Is it possible to change the mock's behavior after instantiation? I see
the property is read-only.

—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.

Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#281 (comment), or mute
the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAKW68QEuPmvjYgB_oFvIImKAzw1EQThks5qjb43gaJpZM4Jlvru
.

/kzu from mobile

[sbrockway]

Thanks for the info @kzu !
Closing the issue as the requested functionality is available via: new Mock<>(MockBehavior.Strict);