Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ci: include env and version in dispatches #1459

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 14, 2024
Merged

Conversation

arealmaas
Copy link
Collaborator

@arealmaas arealmaas commented Nov 14, 2024

Description

To make it more clear what version is deployed to what environment.

The overview now is not that descriptive..

CleanShot 2024-11-14 at 13 38 00

Related Issue(s)

  • #{issue number}

Verification

  • Your code builds clean without any errors or warnings
  • Manual testing done (required)
  • Relevant automated test added (if you find this hard, leave it and we'll help out)

Documentation

  • Documentation is updated (either in docs-directory, Altinnpedia or a separate linked PR in altinn-studio-docs., if applicable)

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Enhanced workflow clarity with dynamic naming for application and infrastructure dispatching, including environment and version details.
  • Bug Fixes
    • Improved job naming conventions for better identification of deployment versions.
  • Documentation
    • Updated workflow configurations to reflect new input and naming conventions for better understanding.

@arealmaas arealmaas requested review from a team as code owners November 14, 2024 12:38
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 14, 2024

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces updates to two GitHub workflow files: dispatch-apps.yml and dispatch-infrastructure.yml. Both workflows now feature a new run-name field that dynamically includes environment and version inputs, enhancing clarity regarding the deployment context. Additionally, job names have been modified to reflect the version being deployed, providing better visibility into the workflow execution.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/dispatch-apps.yml - Added runMigration input (boolean)
- Updated run-name to Dispatch apps ${{ inputs.environment }} v${{ inputs.version }}
- Changed job name from Deploy apps to ${{ inputs.environment }} to Deploy apps to ${{ inputs.environment }} (v${{ inputs.version }})
.github/workflows/dispatch-infrastructure.yml - Updated run-name to Dispatch infrastructure ${{ inputs.environment }} v${{ inputs.version }}
- Changed job name from Deploy infra to ${{ inputs.environment }} to Deploy infra to ${{ inputs.environment }} (v${{ inputs.version }})

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • oskogstad
  • knuhau

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/dispatch-apps.yml (2)

43-43: LGTM! Consistent and descriptive job naming.

The updated job name improves clarity by including the version information. This aligns well with the run-name format and enhances overall workflow visibility.

Consider applying this naming pattern consistently across all deployment workflows in the repository for uniformity.


Line range hint 19-23: Add documentation for the runMigration parameter.

While the parameter is well-defined, it would be helpful to add documentation explaining:

  • When should migrations be run?
  • What are the implications of enabling/disabling migrations?
  • Are there any prerequisites or considerations when running migrations?

Consider adding these details in a comment above the parameter or in the workflow documentation.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7883519 and 4a30251.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/workflows/dispatch-apps.yml (2 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/dispatch-infrastructure.yml (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
.github/workflows/dispatch-infrastructure.yml (3)

21-21: LGTM! Clear and informative run name format.

The addition of run-name with environment and version information improves workflow visibility and aligns well with the PR objectives.


32-32: LGTM! Job name clearly indicates deployment context.

The updated job name format with environment and version in parentheses improves clarity and maintains consistency with the workflow's run name.


Line range hint 21-32: Verify consistency across workflow files.

Let's ensure the naming convention is consistent across all workflow files and that there are no broken references.

✅ Verification successful

Naming conventions and workflow references are consistent

The verification shows:

  • Run-name patterns are consistent across dispatch workflows, following the format Dispatch <type> <environment> v<version>
  • Deploy job names follow a consistent pattern: Deploy <type> to <environment> (v<version>)
  • The workflow is correctly referenced in CI/CD workflows (ci-cd-*.yml)
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistency in workflow naming patterns and potential references

# Check for run-name and job name patterns in other workflow files
echo "Checking for run-name and job name patterns in workflow files..."
fd -e yml -e yaml . .github/workflows/ --exec rg -l "run-name:|name: Deploy.*to.*\(\s*v.*\)"

# Look for potential workflow references that might need updates
echo "Checking for workflow references..."
rg -l "uses: \.\/\.github\/workflows\/(dispatch-infrastructure|workflow-deploy-infra)\.yml" .github/workflows/

Length of output: 713


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's fix the regex and check workflow references properly
echo "Checking workflow references..."
rg -l "uses: \\./.github/workflows/(dispatch-infrastructure|workflow-deploy-infra).yml" .github/workflows/

# Let's examine the run-name and job naming patterns in detail
echo -e "\nChecking run-name patterns in workflows..."
rg "run-name:" -A 1 .github/workflows/dispatch-*.yml

echo -e "\nChecking deploy job names in workflows..."
rg "name: Deploy" -A 1 .github/workflows/dispatch-*.yml

Length of output: 1914

.github/workflows/dispatch-apps.yml (1)

27-28: LGTM! Clear and informative run name.

The addition of a dynamic run-name that includes both environment and version improves workflow visibility and directly addresses the PR objective.

@arealmaas arealmaas merged commit 326b8b8 into main Nov 14, 2024
24 checks passed
@arealmaas arealmaas deleted the ci/include-env-and-version branch November 14, 2024 13:09
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Dec 11, 2024
4 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants