Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Note in performance section that OT 2.4 requires Java 8 #155

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 4, 2017
Merged

Note in performance section that OT 2.4 requires Java 8 #155

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 4, 2017

Conversation

gguillotte
Copy link
Contributor

DITA-OT 2.4 and newer require Java 8. Noting that DITA-OT 2.0 requires Java 7 without including this context can lead to confusion if this is the first page of documentation a user encounters.

@@ -35,7 +35,8 @@
</section>
<section>
<title>Use the latest Java version</title>
<p>DITA-OT 2.0 requires Java 7, but using the latest version Java 8 will further reduce processing time.</p>
<p>DITA-OT 2.0 to 2.3 require Java Runtime Environment (JRE) 7, but using JRE 8 with these versions can
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Java 8 is not the latest Java-SE release anymore. Thus this should still say "latest version".

@infotexture
Copy link
Member

@gguillotte Are you able to update this PR per @jelovirt's comments?

Otherwise, I'll cherry-pick your changes and revise accordingly.

[DITA-OT 2.4 and newer require Java 8.](http://www.dita-ot.org/2.4/release-notes/index.html#ID__requirements) Noting that DITA-OT 2.0 requires Java 7 without including this context can lead to confusion if this is the first page of documentation a user encounters.

Signed-off-by: Garrett Guillotte <gguillotte@users.noreply.github.com>
@infotexture infotexture changed the title Note in performance topic section that OT 2.4 requires JRE 8 Note in performance section that OT 2.4 requires Java 8 Oct 4, 2017
@infotexture infotexture added the enhancement Changes to an existing topic or feature label Oct 4, 2017
Copy link
Member

@infotexture infotexture left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 Thanks for updating.

I'll squash this in for 2.5.4 and revise further.

@infotexture infotexture changed the base branch from master to hotfix/2.5.4 October 4, 2017 23:47
@infotexture infotexture merged commit b6dbf41 into dita-ot:hotfix/2.5.4 Oct 4, 2017
@infotexture infotexture added this to the 2.5.4 milestone Oct 4, 2017
infotexture added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 5, 2017
* hotfix/2.5.4:
  Copyedit Java references
  Note that Java 8 is required as of 2.4 (#155)
  Link to docs diff & GitHub changelog
  Copyedit issue descriptions
  Sort items by earliest issue ID
  Use earliest issue as list item ID
  Enable descriptions for recently resolved issues
  Draft notes for 2806
  Add draft notes for 2805
  Update index.dita
  Clarify system path separator for multiple DITAVALs
  Draft notes for latest fix in 2.5.4
  Draft release notes for existing 2.5.4 issues
  Prepare 2.5.4 Release Notes stub
  Bump 'maintenance-version' key to “2.5.4”
  Use latest DITA-OT version (2.5.3) for CI builds
infotexture added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 5, 2017
* hotfix/2.5.4:
  Copyedit Java references
  Note that Java 8 is required as of 2.4 (#155)
  Link to docs diff & GitHub changelog
  Copyedit issue descriptions
  Sort items by earliest issue ID
  Use earliest issue as list item ID
  Enable descriptions for recently resolved issues
  Draft notes for 2806
  Add draft notes for 2805
  Update index.dita
  Clarify system path separator for multiple DITAVALs
  Draft notes for latest fix in 2.5.4
  Draft release notes for existing 2.5.4 issues
  Prepare 2.5.4 Release Notes stub
  Bump 'maintenance-version' key to “2.5.4”
  Use latest DITA-OT version (2.5.3) for CI builds
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement Changes to an existing topic or feature
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants