Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[fix #1467] Make sure target attribute is kept after DOMPurify sanitization #1468

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Fab1en
Copy link

@Fab1en Fab1en commented Jan 2, 2021

Summary

What kind of change does this PR introduce? (check at least one)

  • Bugfix
  • Feature
  • Code style update
  • Refactor
  • Docs
  • Build-related changes
  • Repo settings
  • Other, please describe:

If changing the UI of default theme, please provide the before/after screenshot:

Does this PR introduce a breaking change? (check one)

  • Yes
  • No

If yes, please describe the impact and migration path for existing applications:

The PR fulfills these requirements:

  • When resolving a specific issue, it's referenced in the PR's title (e.g. fix #xxx[,#xxx], where "xxx" is the issue number)

You have tested in the following browsers: (Providing a detailed version will be better.)

  • Chrome
  • Firefox 84
  • Safari
  • Edge
  • IE

If adding a new feature, the PR's description includes:

  • A convincing reason for adding this feature
  • Related documents have been updated
  • Related tests have been updated

To avoid wasting your time, it's best to open a feature request issue first and wait for approval before working on it.

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Jan 2, 2021

This pull request is being automatically deployed with Vercel (learn more).
To see the status of your deployment, click below or on the icon next to each commit.

🔍 Inspect: https://vercel.com/docsify-core/docsify-preview/BkCKuc1cvzzh5yoySjR62UL9jzFK
✅ Preview: https://docsify-preview-git-fork-fab1en-develop-docsify-core.vercel.app

@codesandbox-ci
Copy link

codesandbox-ci bot commented Jan 2, 2021

This pull request is automatically built and testable in CodeSandbox.

To see build info of the built libraries, click here or the icon next to each commit SHA.

Latest deployment of this branch, based on commit 70c84aa:

Sandbox Source
docsify-template Configuration

@sy-records sy-records requested a review from a team January 2, 2021 10:30
html = this.isRemoteUrl ? DOMPurify.sanitize(html) : html;
// add "target" attribute to DOMPurify white list to handle external links
html = this.isRemoteUrl
? DOMPurify.sanitize(html, { ADD_ATTR: ['target'] })
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

so this change will skip sanitizing the attributes ?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No, this change will consider the target attribute as a valid one and will not remove it. But it does not prevent DOMPurify to sanitize the attribute content. For example, if the following code is present in the source

<a target="javascript:alert('XSS')" href="https://example.com">Test</a>

it will be changed to

<a href="https://example.com">Test</a>

because the value will be considered as unsafe.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

cool, Can you add test(s) for this, Otherwise looks good to me

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@Fab1en So if it sees target="_blank" then it will leave it in that case? Mind adding a small test case?

@jhildenbiddle
Copy link
Member

DOMPurify will likely be removed shortly. See #1490.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants