You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Open two transmit tabs and a single Universe View in sACN 2.1.2
Transmit tab 1: Universe 1, Per-Address Priority, press "..." and set all addresses to priority 0. Set Address 1 alone to 100.
Transmit tab 2: Universe 1, Per-Address Priority, no changes to priority map (all at 100)
Start transmitting in tab 1, bring the address 1 slider up slightly
Universe View (U1): Note that only a single cell is active. Address 1 says it has a winning value from tab 1 at priority 100.
Look at Address 2 - it has no sources
Start transmitting in tab 2
Universe View (U1) now shows for address 2 that there are two active sources. The winning source (from tab 2) at priority 100, and tab 1 at priority 0
Internally, I know per-address priority is setting the value to 0, so this is accurate. However, this makes it appear as if we do have that address patched. (It is an implementation detail that a value of 0 is the "not patched" value). Ideally we should show the single source, or show the inactive addresses consistently.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Priority Mode "Per-Source" (default) is "per-universe", so there are no per-address priority values. The [...] button is disabled and all addresses are 'patched' with the same priority.
In that situation, Per-Source priority 0 is an active value (least important).
Setup:
Internally, I know per-address priority is setting the value to 0, so this is accurate. However, this makes it appear as if we do have that address patched. (It is an implementation detail that a value of 0 is the "not patched" value). Ideally we should show the single source, or show the inactive addresses consistently.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: