Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Only perform eager search after url is set #5934

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Nov 14, 2024
Merged

Only perform eager search after url is set #5934

merged 4 commits into from
Nov 14, 2024

Conversation

jorg-vr
Copy link
Contributor

@jorg-vr jorg-vr commented Nov 14, 2024

This pull request makes sure eager search requests are only performed after the desired url has been set.

This solves a bug which caused eager search requests on the series edit page to try a js search request on the edit page instead of the activity index page. Because it requested js, the series edit page also rendered the js token_field partial instead of the html token_field partial. I also added a fix for that now, as the html page should always render the html partial.

this bug was caused by changes in searchbar in #5471

@jorg-vr jorg-vr added the bug Something isn't working label Nov 14, 2024
@jorg-vr jorg-vr self-assigned this Nov 14, 2024
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 14, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve modifications to several files, primarily focusing on the SearchField class in search_field.ts, where the eager property was removed, simplifying the control flow. The filter property was updated to be optional with a default value. In the _searchbar.html.erb file, a conditional block was added to trigger a search based on the eager parameter. Lastly, the edit.html.erb file was updated to render a partial with a specified format, enhancing the rendering process without altering existing logic.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
app/assets/javascripts/components/search/search_field.ts Removed eager property and its logic; updated filter property to be optional with a default value of an empty string; modified render method for dropdown visibility based on filters and suggestions.
app/views/layouts/_searchbar.html.erb Added a conditional block to trigger dodona.search.search() if eager is true after updating filters.
app/views/series/edit.html.erb Updated render partial: 'token_field' to include formats: [:html], specifying the rendering format.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant SearchField
    participant SearchBar

    User->>SearchField: Input filter
    SearchField->>SearchField: Update filter (optional)
    SearchField-->>SearchBar: Check for suggestions
    SearchBar->>SearchField: Render dropdown based on suggestions
    alt Eager is true
        SearchBar->>SearchField: Trigger search immediately
    end
Loading

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 214ff5a and 1712e06.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • app/assets/javascripts/components/search/search_field.ts (0 hunks)
  • app/views/layouts/_searchbar.html.erb (1 hunks)
  • app/views/series/edit.html.erb (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • app/assets/javascripts/components/search/search_field.ts
🔇 Additional comments (3)
app/views/layouts/_searchbar.html.erb (1)

51-54: LGTM! The eager search implementation looks correct.

The changes ensure that eager search is triggered only after filters are updated and the base URL is set, which aligns with the PR objective of fixing the search behavior on the series edit page.

Let's verify the usage of the eager parameter across the codebase:

✅ Verification successful

The eager search implementation is correctly used across the codebase

The verification shows that the eager parameter is consistently used:

  • Pages that need immediate search results set eager: true (e.g., courses, repositories, labels)
  • Pages that need manual search control set eager: false (e.g., evaluations, course members)
  • Pages without the parameter default to eager: false through the safe fetch in _searchbar.html.erb

The implementation in the series edit page (eager: true) is consistent with other similar pages that require immediate search results.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check how the eager parameter is used in view templates
# Expected: The edit page should not set eager=true, while other pages might

# Search for render calls of the searchbar partial
rg -A 2 "_searchbar.*eager:" "app/views"

# Search for any remaining references to the eager property in JavaScript
rg "eager.*:" "app/assets/javascripts"

Length of output: 79


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for searchbar partial renders and eager references

# Search for any render calls of the searchbar partial
rg "render.*searchbar" "app/views"

# Search for any references to 'eager' in view templates
rg "eager" "app/views"

# Search for any references to SearchField in JavaScript
rg "SearchField" "app/assets/javascripts"

# Check the content of the searchbar partial itself
cat "app/views/layouts/_searchbar.html.erb"

Length of output: 7804

app/views/series/edit.html.erb (2)

25-25: LGTM! The format specification ensures consistent HTML rendering.

This change directly addresses the PR objective by ensuring the token field always renders the HTML partial instead of potentially rendering the JavaScript partial.

Let's verify if there are other token field renderings that might need similar treatment:

✅ Verification successful

All token field renderings have proper format specifications

The verification shows that all instances of token field rendering in the codebase have the correct format specification:

  • app/views/courses/_form.html.erb already includes formats: [:html]
  • app/views/application/_token_field.js.erb correctly specifies formats: [:html] when rendering the HTML partial
  • app/views/series/edit.html.erb is the one being fixed in this PR
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find other token field partial renderings that might need format specification
# Expected: No other instances without format specification to ensure consistent behavior

# Search for token_field partial renderings
rg "render.*partial:.*token_field" --type erb

Length of output: 519


Line range hint 94-94: Verify if the eager parameter is still needed.

Given that the PR focuses on fixing eager search behavior and the SearchField component has been modified to remove the eager property (as mentioned in the AI summary), please verify if the eager: true parameter in the searchbar partial is still required.

Let's check the usage of the eager parameter across the codebase:

✅ Verification successful

Let me gather more information about the searchbar partial and its handling of the eager parameter:


The eager: true parameter is still needed and correctly implemented

The recent commit (ef9f5be) shows that the eager search functionality has been intentionally refactored to move from the SearchField component to the searchbar partial's JavaScript initialization. The parameter is now properly handled to trigger the search only after the URL and filters are set, which aligns with fixing the eager search behavior mentioned in the PR.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check usage of eager parameter in searchbar partial
# Expected: Consistent usage pattern or documentation of different behavior

# Search for searchbar partial renderings with eager parameter
rg "render.*partial:.*searchbar.*eager:" --type erb -A 2

# Search for references to eager in JavaScript
ast-grep --pattern 'eager = $_'

Length of output: 2377


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the searchbar partial implementation and related JavaScript
rg -g "searchbar*" . --type erb -l
rg -g "search*" . --type-add 'js:*.{js,jsx}' --type js -l

# Look for the actual implementation of eager behavior
rg "eager" --type-add 'js:*.{js,jsx}' --type js -A 3

Length of output: 895


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the searchbar partial and its implementation
cat app/views/layouts/_searchbar.html.erb

# Look for the SearchField component implementation
cat app/assets/javascripts/components/search/search_field.ts

# Check for eager-related changes in recent commits
git log -p --grep="eager"

Length of output: 10539


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@jorg-vr jorg-vr merged commit 26e1e98 into main Nov 14, 2024
14 checks passed
@jorg-vr jorg-vr deleted the fix/eager-search branch November 14, 2024 09:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants