Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Prepare release: v1.0.0-rc.1 #2615

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 2, 2024
Merged

Prepare release: v1.0.0-rc.1 #2615

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 2, 2024

Conversation

tarrencev
Copy link
Contributor

@tarrencev tarrencev commented Nov 2, 2024

Automated changes by create-pull-request GitHub action

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Updated workspace version to 1.0.0-rc.1, indicating a new release candidate.
    • Added new dependencies, including slot, enhancing integration capabilities.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved dependency management for better build process and resolution.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 2, 2024

Walkthrough

Ohayo, sensei! The Cargo.toml file has been updated to reflect a new release candidate version 1.0.0-rc.1 from 1.0.0-rc.0. This change includes the addition of new dependencies, specifically the slot dependency sourced from a Git repository with a specified revision. The overall structure of the workspace remains unchanged, with no modifications to existing members or profiles.

Changes

File Change Summary
Cargo.toml - Updated workspace version from 1.0.0-rc.0 to 1.0.0-rc.1.
- Added slot dependency with git source and specific revision.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • kariy

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
Cargo.toml (1)

Line range hint 190-192: Consider dependency management strategy for scarb

Ohayo sensei! I notice we're using a forked version of scarb from dojoengine/scarb. While this is sometimes necessary, it introduces maintenance overhead. Consider:

  1. Documenting the reasons for using the fork
  2. Creating a plan to migrate back to upstream when possible
  3. Setting up automated dependency updates for the fork
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 301706a and 3d54aad.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • Cargo.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • Cargo.toml (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
Cargo.toml (2)

58-58: Ohayo sensei! Version bump looks good!

The version update to 1.0.0-rc.1 follows semantic versioning and aligns with the release preparation objective.


Line range hint 272-273: Verify slot dependency revision stability

While using a git revision for the slot dependency is acceptable, consider:

  1. Using a version tag instead of a commit hash for better maintainability
  2. Documenting why this specific revision was chosen

Let's verify the commit exists and is stable:

✅ Verification successful

Ohayo sensei! The slot dependency commit is verified and stable

The commit 1298a30 exists and is from October 13, 2024, which is recent and has a clear parent commit. While there's no version tag for this specific commit, the dependency appears stable as:

  • The commit exists in the repository
  • It's a recent commit (about a month old)
  • It has a proper parent commit, indicating it's part of the main development line

No immediate action is required, but for future maintenance, consider:

  • Adding a comment explaining why this specific commit was chosen
  • Watching for any released tags that could replace this commit reference
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify the slot dependency commit
gh api repos/cartridge-gg/slot/commits/1298a30 --jq '.sha' || echo "Commit not found"

Length of output: 99


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check if this commit is recent and stable by getting its date and parent commits
gh api repos/cartridge-gg/slot/commits/1298a30 --jq '[.commit.author.date, .parents[].sha]'

# Also check if there are any tags pointing to this commit
gh api repos/cartridge-gg/slot/git/refs/tags --jq '.[] | select(.object.sha == "1298a302db76767e28af5cbce842acdfb507bb29") | .ref'

Length of output: 294

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 2, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 57.94%. Comparing base (301706a) to head (3d54aad).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2615      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   57.95%   57.94%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         393      393              
  Lines       48567    48567              
==========================================
- Hits        28148    28143       -5     
- Misses      20419    20424       +5     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@glihm glihm merged commit 6deb0ec into main Nov 2, 2024
13 of 14 checks passed
@glihm glihm deleted the prepare-release branch November 2, 2024 16:10
This was referenced Nov 10, 2024
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Nov 26, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants