fix: simplify ui for better readability of sozo output #2656
Conversation
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2656 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 57.46% 57.45% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 400 400
Lines 49963 49953 -10
==========================================
- Hits 28709 28702 -7
+ Misses 21254 21251 -3 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
WalkthroughOhayo, sensei! This pull request introduces several updates across three files, focusing on enhancing the visual representation of output and simplifying error messages. In Changes
Possibly related PRs
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
crates/sozo/ops/src/migration_ui.rs (1)
25-27: Ohayo sensei! The ninja-themed spinner looks clean! 🥷The new spinner frames provide a more professional and focused look, which aligns well with the PR's goal of improving readability. The timing of 500ms is appropriate for smooth animation.
However, consider using more minimalistic symbols for better readability in different terminal environments, as some emoji might not render consistently.
Alternative suggestion:
- let frames = spinner!(["⛩️ ", "🥷 ", "🗡️ "], 500); + let frames = spinner!(["|", "/", "-", "\\"], 500);🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 25-25: crates/sozo/ops/src/migration_ui.rs#L25
Added line #L25 was not covered by testsbin/sozo/src/commands/inspect.rs (3)
69-69: Color update looks great, sensei! Consider adding tests.The switch to
bright_black()improves visibility while maintaining visual hierarchy. However, these changes aren't covered by tests.Would you like me to help create tests for these color display implementations? We could verify that the formatted output contains the correct ANSI color codes.
Also applies to: 152-152
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 69-69: bin/sozo/src/commands/inspect.rs#L69
Added line #L69 was not covered by tests
442-442: Nice choice with psql style, sensei!The switch to
Style::psql()provides a clean, professional look that's familiar to developers. However, this styling change isn't covered by tests.Would you like me to help create tests to verify the table styling? We could assert that the rendered table contains the expected psql-style borders and formatting.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 442-442: bin/sozo/src/commands/inspect.rs#L442
Added line #L442 was not covered by tests
484-484: Color update enhances readability, sensei!The switch to
bright_black()for TOML keys improves visibility while maintaining visual hierarchy. However, this formatting change isn't covered by tests.Would you like me to help create tests for the TOML pretty printing? We could verify that keys are correctly colored and the output maintains proper formatting.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 484-484: bin/sozo/src/commands/inspect.rs#L484
Added line #L484 was not covered by tests
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
bin/sozo/src/commands/inspect.rs(5 hunks)bin/sozo/src/commands/migrate.rs(3 hunks)crates/sozo/ops/src/migration_ui.rs(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
bin/sozo/src/commands/inspect.rs
[warning] 69-69: bin/sozo/src/commands/inspect.rs#L69
Added line #L69 was not covered by tests
[warning] 152-152: bin/sozo/src/commands/inspect.rs#L152
Added line #L152 was not covered by tests
[warning] 442-442: bin/sozo/src/commands/inspect.rs#L442
Added line #L442 was not covered by tests
[warning] 484-484: bin/sozo/src/commands/inspect.rs#L484
Added line #L484 was not covered by tests
bin/sozo/src/commands/migrate.rs
[warning] 76-76: bin/sozo/src/commands/migrate.rs#L76
Added line #L76 was not covered by tests
[warning] 86-86: bin/sozo/src/commands/migrate.rs#L86
Added line #L86 was not covered by tests
[warning] 109-110: bin/sozo/src/commands/migrate.rs#L109-L110
Added lines #L109 - L110 were not covered by tests
[warning] 113-113: bin/sozo/src/commands/migrate.rs#L113
Added line #L113 was not covered by tests
crates/sozo/ops/src/migration_ui.rs
[warning] 25-25: crates/sozo/ops/src/migration_ui.rs#L25
Added line #L25 was not covered by tests
🔇 Additional comments (5)
crates/sozo/ops/src/migration_ui.rs (1)
25-25: Add test coverage for the spinner frames, sensei!
The static analysis indicates that the spinner frame configuration lacks test coverage. While UI elements can be tricky to test, we should ensure the basic initialization works as expected.
Would you like me to help create a test case? Here's what we could verify:
- Spinner initialization with custom frames
- Frame count and timing
- Silent mode behavior
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 25-25: crates/sozo/ops/src/migration_ui.rs#L25
Added line #L25 was not covered by tests
bin/sozo/src/commands/migrate.rs (3)
86-86: Test coverage needed for successful migration paths, sensei!
The success message has been updated, but this path lacks test coverage. Success scenarios are crucial test cases.
Let's check existing success path tests:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for test cases related to successful migrations
rg -l "successful.*migration|migration.*success" --type rustWould you like assistance in creating comprehensive test cases for successful migrations?
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 86-86: bin/sozo/src/commands/migrate.rs#L86
Added line #L86 was not covered by tests
109-110: Ohayo! Chain ID parsing needs defensive testing, sensei.
The chain ID parsing and profile validation are critical operations that should be thoroughly tested. Consider:
- Invalid chain ID formats
- Missing profile scenarios
- Edge cases in parsing
Consider adding error type definitions for better error handling:
#[derive(Debug, thiserror::Error)]
pub enum MigrationError {
#[error("Invalid chain ID format: {0}")]
InvalidChainId(String),
#[error("Profile not set")]
ProfileNotSet,
// ... other error types
}Let's check existing chain ID related tests:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for chain ID related test cases
rg -l "chain_id.*test|test.*chain_id" --type rustAlso applies to: 113-113
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 109-110: bin/sozo/src/commands/migrate.rs#L109-L110
Added lines #L109 - L110 were not covered by tests
76-76: Ohayo sensei! Consider adding test coverage for error scenarios.
While simplifying the error message improves readability, this error path isn't covered by tests. Adding test coverage would help ensure reliable error handling.
Let's check existing test coverage:
Would you like me to help create test cases for migration failure scenarios?
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 76-76: bin/sozo/src/commands/migrate.rs#L76
Added line #L76 was not covered by tests
bin/sozo/src/commands/inspect.rs (1)
10-10: Ohayo sensei! LGTM on the import update!
The switch from Theme to Style aligns well with the simplified UI approach.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Refactor