[jwt] fix typo in plugin options name

[EmrysMyrddin]

No description provided.

[changeset-bot]

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: d737143

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 1 package

Name	Type
@graphql-yoga/plugin-jwt	Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

[github-actions]

✅ Benchmark Results

     ✓ no_errors{mode:graphql}
     ✓ expected_result{mode:graphql}
     ✓ no_errors{mode:graphql-jit}
     ✓ expected_result{mode:graphql-jit}
     ✓ no_errors{mode:graphql-response-cache}
     ✓ expected_result{mode:graphql-response-cache}
     ✓ no_errors{mode:graphql-no-parse-validate-cache}
     ✓ expected_result{mode:graphql-no-parse-validate-cache}
     ✓ no_errors{mode:uws}
     ✓ expected_result{mode:uws}

     checks.......................................: 100.00% ✓ 517828      ✗ 0     
     data_received................................: 2.1 GB  14 MB/s
     data_sent....................................: 104 MB  694 kB/s
     http_req_blocked.............................: avg=1.5µs    min=982ns    med=1.33µs   max=293.87µs p(90)=1.98µs   p(95)=2.17µs  
     http_req_connecting..........................: avg=2ns      min=0s       med=0s       max=160.86µs p(90)=0s       p(95)=0s      
     http_req_duration............................: avg=363.65µs min=219.63µs med=327.03µs max=18.28ms  p(90)=462.36µs p(95)=484.55µs
       { expected_response:true }.................: avg=363.65µs min=219.63µs med=327.03µs max=18.28ms  p(90)=462.36µs p(95)=484.55µs
     ✓ { mode:graphql-jit }.......................: avg=293.46µs min=219.63µs med=270.98µs max=18.28ms  p(90)=303.02µs p(95)=319.44µs
     ✓ { mode:graphql-no-parse-validate-cache }...: avg=492.38µs min=399.98µs med=463.81µs max=9.65ms   p(90)=507.27µs p(95)=536.52µs
     ✓ { mode:graphql-response-cache }............: avg=345.47µs min=267.8µs  med=326.02µs max=8.87ms   p(90)=358.13µs p(95)=371.88µs
     ✓ { mode:graphql }...........................: avg=371.06µs min=273.45µs med=334.67µs max=13.31ms  p(90)=392.45µs p(95)=441.12µs
     ✓ { mode:uws }...............................: avg=350.89µs min=271.51µs med=327.61µs max=9.58ms   p(90)=363.32µs p(95)=383.45µs
     http_req_failed..............................: 0.00%   ✓ 0           ✗ 258914
     http_req_receiving...........................: avg=33.5µs   min=16.52µs  med=33.32µs  max=831.23µs p(90)=39.49µs  p(95)=42.18µs 
     http_req_sending.............................: avg=8.6µs    min=6.03µs   med=7.63µs   max=305.22µs p(90)=11.07µs  p(95)=12.03µs 
     http_req_tls_handshaking.....................: avg=0s       min=0s       med=0s       max=0s       p(90)=0s       p(95)=0s      
     http_req_waiting.............................: avg=321.54µs min=183.87µs med=285.78µs max=18.15ms  p(90)=419.56µs p(95)=439.63µs
     http_reqs....................................: 258914  1726.074272/s
     iteration_duration...........................: avg=574.42µs min=384.61µs med=535µs    max=18.92ms  p(90)=677.58µs p(95)=704.95µs
     iterations...................................: 258914  1726.074272/s
     vus..........................................: 1       min=1         max=1   
     vus_max......................................: 2       min=2         max=2   

[github-actions]

Apollo Federation Subgraph Compatibility Results

Federation 1 Support	Federation 2 Support
_service 🟢 @key (single) 🟢 @key (multi) 🟢 @key (composite) 🟢 repeatable @key 🟢 @requires 🟢 @provides 🟢 federated tracing 🟢	@link 🟢 @shareable 🟢 @tag 🟢 @override 🟢 @inaccessible 🟢 @composeDirective 🟢 @interfaceObject 🟢

Learn more:

• Apollo Federation Subgraph Specification
• Compatibility Tests

[github-actions]

💻 Website Preview

The latest changes are available as preview in: https://b2256dac.graphql-yoga.pages.dev

[ardatan]

Can we add a test for the backward compatibility to prevent future regressions?

[EmrysMyrddin]

You mean you want the old misspelled option should continue to work and we should have a test for this ?

[ardatan]

Yes, Until we completely remove it, let's make sure it works.

[ardatan]

Oh i just realized this change would break the existing users because it needs signing one as required while the old one is optional now. A union type would be better no?

[EmrysMyrddin]

Aaaah you're right ! I will fix this and add test