-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update RDG to use interceptors feature #48555
Conversation
src/Http/Http.Extensions/gen/StaticRouteHandler/Model/Endpoint.cs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...tDelegateGenerator/Baselines/MapAction_ExplicitHeader_NullableStringArrayParam.generated.txt
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
709c0d8
to
3c020e2
Compare
b84d1b9
to
983fdb4
Compare
16e9213
to
d72d26f
Compare
d72d26f
to
c528e8f
Compare
[System.Diagnostics.CodeAnalysis.UnconditionalSuppressMessage("AOT", "IL3050", Justification = "This implementation invokes uses compile-time code gen to construct the RequestDelegate.")] | ||
[System.Diagnostics.CodeAnalysis.UnconditionalSuppressMessage("Trimming", "IL2026", Justification = "This implementation invokes uses compile-time code gen to construct the RequestDelegate.")] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't understand why we are getting these warnings. Can you explain?
@@ -9,8 +9,8 @@ | |||
using Microsoft.AspNetCore.App.Analyzers.Infrastructure; | |||
using Microsoft.CodeAnalysis; | |||
using Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Operations; | |||
using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Http.RequestDelegateGenerator.StaticRouteHandlerModel.Emitters; | |||
using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Http.RequestDelegateGenerator.StaticRouteHandlerModel; | |||
using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Http.RequestDelegateGenerator.StaticRouteHandler.Emitters; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It might help out doing the review if this refactoring was separated into its own PR.
Addresses #48289