Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix F#/C# versions for .NET 6/7 #8949

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Dec 14, 2023
Merged

Fix F#/C# versions for .NET 6/7 #8949

merged 6 commits into from
Dec 14, 2023

Conversation

mairaw
Copy link
Contributor

@mairaw mairaw commented Nov 21, 2023

We got a customer feedback for the site complaining about .NET 7 needing to support F# 7

It seems we decreased the version starting with 7.0.11

Fixes https://github.com/dotnet/website/issues/5834

@mairaw mairaw changed the title Fix F# versions for .NET 7 Fix F#/C# versions for .NET 6/7 Dec 12, 2023
"csharp-version": "10.0-preview",
"fsharp-version": "6.0-preview",
"csharp-version": "10.0",
"fsharp-version": "7.0",
"vb-version": "15.5",
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should this be 16.9 like the others?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes nothing has changed with VB language versions.

@mairaw mairaw requested a review from jaredpar December 13, 2023 19:02
@mairaw
Copy link
Contributor Author

mairaw commented Dec 13, 2023

@jaredpar I realized I had added the wrong C# version for .NET 7 on my changes. So requesting a new review after my changes to make sure I didn't make other mistakes.

@mairaw mairaw merged commit c6595a0 into main Dec 14, 2023
3 checks passed
@mairaw mairaw deleted the fsharp-versions branch December 14, 2023 20:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants