Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update records-wip.md #3505

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 30, 2020
Merged

Update records-wip.md #3505

merged 2 commits into from
May 30, 2020

Conversation

agocke
Copy link
Member

@agocke agocke commented May 27, 2020

No description provided.

@gafter
Copy link
Member

gafter commented May 27, 2020

For each record parameter of a record type declaration there is a corresponding public property member whose name and type are taken from the value parameter declaration. If no concrete (i.e. non-abstract) property with a get accessor and with this name and type is explicitly declared or inherited, it is produced by the compiler as follows:

instance property? Does the access on the inherited property matter?


Refers to: proposals/records-wip.md:56 in 69f18ad. [](commit_id = 69f18ad, deletion_comment = False)

@agocke agocke merged commit 04f998e into dotnet:master May 30, 2020
@agocke agocke deleted the with-expr-fixes branch May 30, 2020 19:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants